More actions
JubalHarshaw (talk | contribs) m thanks ... I had forgotten about the Ambrosia / Ambrosa articles |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
No need to have a placeholder here. It should be a disambiguation for the two kinds named in either series. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:22, 8 January 2007 (CST) | No need to have a placeholder here. It should be a disambiguation for the two kinds named in either series. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:22, 8 January 2007 (CST) | ||
::Thanks, I had forgotten about the Ambrosa / Ambrosia articles. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 13:34, 8 January 2007 (CST) | ::Thanks, I had forgotten about the Ambrosa / Ambrosia articles. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 13:34, 8 January 2007 (CST) | ||
What about doing it something like this:<br> | |||
*Original Series:<br> | |||
:*Ambrosa<br> | |||
:*Ale<br> | |||
:*...<br> | |||
*Re-Imagined Series<br> | |||
:*Ambrosia<br> | |||
Makes the distinction between the shows clearer --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 13:57, 8 January 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 19:57, 8 January 2007
Disambiguation
No need to have a placeholder here. It should be a disambiguation for the two kinds named in either series. --Spencerian 13:22, 8 January 2007 (CST)
- Thanks, I had forgotten about the Ambrosa / Ambrosia articles. JubalHarshaw 13:34, 8 January 2007 (CST)
What about doing it something like this:
- Original Series:
- Ambrosa
- Ale
- ...
- Ambrosa
- Re-Imagined Series
- Ambrosia
- Ambrosia
Makes the distinction between the shows clearer --Serenity 13:57, 8 January 2007 (CST)