Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Baltar as Cylon speculation/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Baltar as Cylon speculation/Archive 1
Spencerian (talk | contribs)
Major Revision
Gougef (talk | contribs)
→‎Major Revision: excellent work!
Line 6: Line 6:


I've updated and concised this article, removing some [[BW:FANW|fanwanking]] and disproven [[BW:CJ|plausible speculation]] and detailing season three events where Baltar's nature is directly questioned in a story arc. I've also altered the article's tone to make it more neutral. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 11:23, 6 January 2007 (CST)
I've updated and concised this article, removing some [[BW:FANW|fanwanking]] and disproven [[BW:CJ|plausible speculation]] and detailing season three events where Baltar's nature is directly questioned in a story arc. I've also altered the article's tone to make it more neutral. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 11:23, 6 January 2007 (CST)
:Excellent update! --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 21:57, 6 January 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 03:57, 7 January 2007

Being from the standard Wikipedia, and not knowing the nature of this type of article, how are these questions able to be discussed here? What I'm driving at is, I have theories of my own about who/what Baltar is, which seem to fit my observations. Are they appropriate here? If not, how are these other speculations plausible? Thanks in advance for any replies. - Cobaltbluetony 10:08, 17 November 2006 (CST)

Feel free to discuss them on the talk pages, first- it saves some effort if edits on the main page have to be reverted, etc :) --Madbrood 02:33, 21 December 2006 (CST)

Major Revision

I've updated and concised this article, removing some fanwanking and disproven plausible speculation and detailing season three events where Baltar's nature is directly questioned in a story arc. I've also altered the article's tone to make it more neutral. --Spencerian 11:23, 6 January 2007 (CST)

Excellent update! --FrankieG 21:57, 6 January 2007 (CST)