More actions
+ question about accuracy |
m Talk:Micron (TOS) moved to Talk:Micron |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is "(specifically, 0.6 seconds)" accurate? I don't remember centon being defined that exactly. --[[User:PrePressChris|PrePressChris]] 14:23, 20 October 2006 (CDT) | Is "(specifically, 0.6 seconds)" accurate? I don't remember centon being defined that exactly. --[[User:PrePressChris|PrePressChris]] 14:23, 20 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
:I can't give you an episode reference, but if one centon is one minute and contains 100 microns, then one micron is 0.6 seconds --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 14:33, 20 October 2006 (CDT) | |||
::True, but if one micron is one second, then a centon is a bit over a minute and a half, a centar is two and a half hours, etc. Do we know that any one of those units were defined to be exact equivalents? I thought that they were only roughly analagous. --[[User:PrePressChris|PrePressChris]] 14:56, 20 October 2006 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:47, 13 August 2007
Is "(specifically, 0.6 seconds)" accurate? I don't remember centon being defined that exactly. --PrePressChris 14:23, 20 October 2006 (CDT)
- I can't give you an episode reference, but if one centon is one minute and contains 100 microns, then one micron is 0.6 seconds --Serenity 14:33, 20 October 2006 (CDT)
- True, but if one micron is one second, then a centon is a bit over a minute and a half, a centar is two and a half hours, etc. Do we know that any one of those units were defined to be exact equivalents? I thought that they were only roughly analagous. --PrePressChris 14:56, 20 October 2006 (CDT)