Battlestar Wiki talk:Assume good faith: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Assume good faith
More actions
Steelviper (talk | contribs) →Delete?: indicate that I was suggesting text for the template: |
Spencerian (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Possible text: | ::Possible text: | ||
::''The preceding text was sarcastic. In the event that it was meant to be taken seriously, it probably wouldn't have had a '''SARCASM TAG''' immediately following it.'' Hmm... Maybe not.--[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:42, 27 September 2006 (CDT) | ::''The preceding text was sarcastic. In the event that it was meant to be taken seriously, it probably wouldn't have had a '''SARCASM TAG''' immediately following it.'' Hmm... Maybe not.--[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:42, 27 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
==Cleanup== | |||
Needs mopup and "help". Thanks, --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 11:11, 27 September 2006 (CDT) | |||
:Done. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:52, 16 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:52, 16 February 2007
Delete?
This blatant personal attack against me should be deleted immediately... (It's a shame that there aren't [smartass] or [sarcasm] HTML or XHTML tags. It might save some confusion.) --Steelviper 10:11, 27 September 2006 (CDT)
- Shane, how about a sarcasm templete :) --FrankieG 10:13, 27 September 2006 (CDT)
- Possible text:
- The preceding text was sarcastic. In the event that it was meant to be taken seriously, it probably wouldn't have had a SARCASM TAG immediately following it. Hmm... Maybe not.--Steelviper 10:42, 27 September 2006 (CDT)
Cleanup
Needs mopup and "help". Thanks, --FrankieG 11:11, 27 September 2006 (CDT)
- Done. --Spencerian 08:52, 16 February 2007 (CST)