File talk:Galacticawatertankburst2 102 1080i.jpg: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of File:Galacticawatertankburst2 102 1080i.jpg
(image hierarchy?)
 
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Should we keep the HD version over the DVD version? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:54, 18 May 2006 (CDT)
Should we keep the HD version over the DVD version? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:54, 18 May 2006 (CDT)
:DVD version is sharper and larger dimensions. Some of these "HD" screencaps arnt ''true'' HD because they have been recorded to a computer and so quality is lost in the conversion from HD broadcast to avi to screenshot to jpg... etc --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 07:56, 18 May 2006 (CDT)
::It's the scaling down, mostly. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar|T]])</sup> 10:00, 18 May 2006 (CDT)
:::I must also say that so far, I have not been impressed with very many of the supposedly "high definition" images uploaded by people so far. Many of them seem very fuzzy and some are no better than some of the broadcast screenshots. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 10:04, 18 May 2006 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 15:04, 18 May 2006

Should we keep the HD version over the DVD version? --Steelviper 07:54, 18 May 2006 (CDT)

DVD version is sharper and larger dimensions. Some of these "HD" screencaps arnt true HD because they have been recorded to a computer and so quality is lost in the conversion from HD broadcast to avi to screenshot to jpg... etc --Mercifull 07:56, 18 May 2006 (CDT)
It's the scaling down, mostly. --CalculatinAvatar(C-T) 10:00, 18 May 2006 (CDT)
I must also say that so far, I have not been impressed with very many of the supposedly "high definition" images uploaded by people so far. Many of them seem very fuzzy and some are no better than some of the broadcast screenshots. --Mercifull 10:04, 18 May 2006 (CDT)