Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

File talk:Pan-galactic.JPG: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of File:Pan-galactic.JPG
Mercifull (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Joe Beaudoin Jr. (talk | contribs)
m Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
When looking at the fullsize version of this image. It appears that the word "Clipper" appears on the nose. Does anyone else see this? Also still waiting on an official source for this image --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 08:12, 1 June 2006 (CDT)
When looking at the fullsize version of this image. It appears that the word "Clipper" appears on the nose. Does anyone else see this? Also still waiting on an official source for this image --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 08:12, 1 June 2006 (CDT)
:All the pan-am planes were named "__ Clipper", so that would be appropriate here - if the image turns out to be official. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 10:15, 1 June 2006 (CDT)
::http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j81/steel_viper/BSG/clipper.jpg
::It MAY be "Caprica Clipper" (the "ica" is semi-legible, but the first part of it is pretty blurred). I'm not confident enough in that to put it anywhere but here in the talk page, but I'm glad it was mentioned. I hadn't even noticed it before. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:31, 1 June 2006 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020

When looking at the fullsize version of this image. It appears that the word "Clipper" appears on the nose. Does anyone else see this? Also still waiting on an official source for this image --Mercifull 08:12, 1 June 2006 (CDT)

All the pan-am planes were named "__ Clipper", so that would be appropriate here - if the image turns out to be official. --April Arcus 10:15, 1 June 2006 (CDT)
http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j81/steel_viper/BSG/clipper.jpg
It MAY be "Caprica Clipper" (the "ica" is semi-legible, but the first part of it is pretty blurred). I'm not confident enough in that to put it anywhere but here in the talk page, but I'm glad it was mentioned. I hadn't even noticed it before. --Steelviper 10:31, 1 June 2006 (CDT)