Talk:Battle of the Basestars/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Battle of the Basestars/Archive 1
More actions
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Serenity in topic Before article is even created...
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Should we have an article indicating this battle in close proximity of Orion's belt? [[User:Shane|Shane]] ([[User_Talk:Shane|talk]]) 17:05, 19 April 2008 (UTC) | Should we have an article indicating this battle in close proximity of Orion's belt? [[User:Shane|Shane]] ([[User_Talk:Shane|talk]]) 17:05, 19 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
: Is this near Orion's belt at all, or merely in visible range of the constellation Orion... There ''is'' a difference. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 17:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC) | : Is this near Orion's belt at all, or merely in visible range of the constellation Orion... There ''is'' a difference. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 17:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
::It would be in relative proximity of Earth, given that the constellation looks the same or similar than viewed from Earth. As for an article, I'm not sure. It would be pretty short, but if some first-hand consequences develop from the engagement and article with "events leading up to" and "aftermath" might be good. However, this would enlarge the battle template even further, given that we'd need to add a new header. -- [[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 17:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::This would probably fit in a separate Cylon Civil War article, which we should really have anyway. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 17:18, 19 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::Yeah, that would probably be better than more battle articles as it has everything in one place and can then put the events into context with each other. The battle can be a sub-section of such an article. -- [[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 17:23, 19 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:23, 19 April 2008
Before article is even created...
Should we have an article indicating this battle in close proximity of Orion's belt? Shane (talk) 17:05, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Is this near Orion's belt at all, or merely in visible range of the constellation Orion... There is a difference. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 17:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- It would be in relative proximity of Earth, given that the constellation looks the same or similar than viewed from Earth. As for an article, I'm not sure. It would be pretty short, but if some first-hand consequences develop from the engagement and article with "events leading up to" and "aftermath" might be good. However, this would enlarge the battle template even further, given that we'd need to add a new header. -- Serenity 17:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- This would probably fit in a separate Cylon Civil War article, which we should really have anyway. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 17:18, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, that would probably be better than more battle articles as it has everything in one place and can then put the events into context with each other. The battle can be a sub-section of such an article. -- Serenity 17:23, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- This would probably fit in a separate Cylon Civil War article, which we should really have anyway. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 17:18, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- It would be in relative proximity of Earth, given that the constellation looks the same or similar than viewed from Earth. As for an article, I'm not sure. It would be pretty short, but if some first-hand consequences develop from the engagement and article with "events leading up to" and "aftermath" might be good. However, this would enlarge the battle template even further, given that we'd need to add a new header. -- Serenity 17:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)