m Talk:Crikey moved to Talk:Mate |
→Sortable Table?: giving credit where credit is due |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Each project now also has an image. It will never be in the template, but right below it in the <nowiki>[[Image:BSG WIKI <Imagename>.png|right]]</nowiki> format. This is just to give the pages more of a "look" instead of just text. Merc, some of the images are not created because there are no templates. So just go through each project to see if I used one of the images already. If not, use your imagingeation. I have already speficied the image names. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 07:42, 27 April 2006 (CDT) | Each project now also has an image. It will never be in the template, but right below it in the <nowiki>[[Image:BSG WIKI <Imagename>.png|right]]</nowiki> format. This is just to give the pages more of a "look" instead of just text. Merc, some of the images are not created because there are no templates. So just go through each project to see if I used one of the images already. If not, use your imagingeation. I have already speficied the image names. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 07:42, 27 April 2006 (CDT) | ||
== Sortable Table? == | |||
I saw Joe implement that nifty sortable table over at the [[List of Vipers]], and while I was thinking about the massive list of potential projects at TGM, I was wondering at what order projects should be displayed in. I then put the two together... what if you had a user sortable table of the projects. That way you could sort by name, priority, "deadline", completion %, # members... whatever. Some of those are values that seem like it'd be pretty manually intensive to keep current, but it was just a brainstorm. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:03, 18 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
:Not a bad idea. right now everything is Alphabetical. Could be done differently. [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 11:20, 18 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
: Actually, credit should go to [[User:DrWho42|DrWho42]], where I got my inspiration to add that style class to those lists. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 18:00, 18 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:00, 18 May 2007
Project Images[edit]
Each project now also has an image. It will never be in the template, but right below it in the [[Image:BSG WIKI <Imagename>.png|right]] format. This is just to give the pages more of a "look" instead of just text. Merc, some of the images are not created because there are no templates. So just go through each project to see if I used one of the images already. If not, use your imagingeation. I have already speficied the image names. --Shane (T - C - E) 07:42, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
Sortable Table?[edit]
I saw Joe implement that nifty sortable table over at the List of Vipers, and while I was thinking about the massive list of potential projects at TGM, I was wondering at what order projects should be displayed in. I then put the two together... what if you had a user sortable table of the projects. That way you could sort by name, priority, "deadline", completion %, # members... whatever. Some of those are values that seem like it'd be pretty manually intensive to keep current, but it was just a brainstorm. --Steelviper 07:03, 18 May 2007 (CDT)
- Not a bad idea. right now everything is Alphabetical. Could be done differently. Shane (T - C - E) 11:20, 18 May 2007 (CDT)
- Actually, credit should go to DrWho42, where I got my inspiration to add that style class to those lists. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 18:00, 18 May 2007 (CDT)