Spencerian (talk | contribs) Deletion discussion |
JubalHarshaw (talk | contribs) m yep, deletion time |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This article lends nothing to what has already been categorized in the colony breakdown in the parent article, [[The Twelve Colonies (TOS)]], despite my attempts to remove verbosity and try to augment it with something relevant. Comments? --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:42, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | This article lends nothing to what has already been categorized in the colony breakdown in the parent article, [[The Twelve Colonies (TOS)]], despite my attempts to remove verbosity and try to augment it with something relevant. Comments? --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:42, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
:There isn't much content and thus it's not very informative. Deleting it is no real loss. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:49, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
::Agreed, especially if it's already in [[The Twelve Colonies (TOS)]] in some way, shape, or form. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 08:50, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:50, 10 April 2007
Deletion discussion
This article lends nothing to what has already been categorized in the colony breakdown in the parent article, The Twelve Colonies (TOS), despite my attempts to remove verbosity and try to augment it with something relevant. Comments? --Spencerian 08:42, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
- There isn't much content and thus it's not very informative. Deleting it is no real loss. --Serenity 08:49, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
- Agreed, especially if it's already in The Twelve Colonies (TOS) in some way, shape, or form. JubalHarshaw 08:50, 10 April 2007 (CDT)