| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 41: |
Line 41: |
|
| |
|
| To clarify Joe's comment in case it was confusing, anyone with a user account 30 days and older can vote. For you, that time is July 30, one month after your account creation. In future RFAs, you can vote immediately. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 00:41, 24 July 2007 (CDT) | | To clarify Joe's comment in case it was confusing, anyone with a user account 30 days and older can vote. For you, that time is July 30, one month after your account creation. In future RFAs, you can vote immediately. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 00:41, 24 July 2007 (CDT) |
| :Noted, thanks Spence. --[[User:Veepz|Veepz]] 07:08, 24 July 2007 (CDT)
| |
| :Sorry if I was confusing. :-) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 17:15, 24 July 2007 (CDT)
| |
| ::It's okay. You weren't confusing anyhow. [[BW:RFA]] explained things well. :) --[[User:Veepz|Veepz]] 19:41, 24 July 2007 (CDT)
| |
| ::: Great! :-) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 19:54, 24 July 2007 (CDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Note on capitalization (maybe it's just me) ==
| |
|
| |
| Not sure how others feel about this. We use "Re-imagined Series" as proper noun, and that's correct. However, when you say "re-imagined ''Battlestar Galactica''", you use it as adjective. In that case it should stay lowercase IMHO. Though I see that it appears somewhat inconsistent and nitpicky. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:16, 24 July 2007 (CDT)
| |
| :My first goal for this wiki was to make it more consistent, the 'little' things. I guess because they stand out to me when I read. Sorry if I'm doing things incorrectly, and thank you for pointing them out. I've always thought "Re-imagined Series" should be capitlized per [[BW:SAC#Disambiguation|BW:SAC]](doesn't it look neater too? :P that's irrelevant anyway), but I do see where you're coming from. I will go back and revise if no other opinions are expressed. -- [[User:Veepz|Veepz]] 19:44, 24 July 2007 (CDT)
| |
| ::And "Re-imagined Series" is correct. It's just "Re-imagined ''Battlestar Galactica''" that's the issue here. :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:37, 25 July 2007 (CDT)
| |
| :I have to agree with Serenity; the issue with "Re-imagined Series" is that it's basically a proper noun for "re-imagined ''Battlestar Galactica''", thus the "re-imagined" before ''Battlestar Galactica'' should never be capitalized. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 19:53, 24 July 2007 (CDT)
| |
| ::Okay! That takes care of that. :-) -- [[User:Veepz|Veepz]] 19:57, 24 July 2007 (CDT)
| |
| ::How about [[The Cylons' Secret|here]]? If "Re-imagined" comes after "''Battlestar Galactica''", as "''Battlestar Galactica'' Re-imagined Series" -- [[User:Veepz|Veepz]] 20:09, 24 July 2007 (CDT)
| |
| :::That looks grammatically weird. The purpose of having "Re-imagined Series" is to ''avoid'' having to type in "Battlestar Galactica" all the time, as well as being a way to differentiate from the Original Series (which follows the same rule). Since we ''are'' a wiki on ''Battlestar'', typing the title is a bit redundant and confusing, so I'd recommend using only "Re-imagined Series" or "Original Series" in most cases. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 02:08, 25 July 2007 (CDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Curiosity ==
| |
|
| |
| I'm quite curious. What is the purpose of '''&#39;s'''<s>(see the edit box)</s>? Is it something more than just apostrophe S... Or not? -- [[User:Veepz|Veepz]] 15:41, 31 July 2007 (CDT)
| |
| :Exactly where in the edit box do you see that? Anyway, it's probably to prevent the single quote from being seen as part of wiki markup (as in <nowiki>''Galactica'''s</nowiki>, which sometimes gives problems). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:01, 31 July 2007 (CDT)
| |
| :: I'm talking about & # 39 ;s, ''without'' the spaces. If you look at, for example, [[Noel Allison]] and click on 'edit'. In the edit box there is the whole ''& 39 s'' thing in place of the '''s''. Your explanation does make sense though. Thanks. -- [[User:Veepz|Veepz]] 16:10, 31 July 2007 (CDT)
| |
| :::I noticed that too sometimes, but rarely now. Not sure if it's intentional or some markup error. There is a problem with using a certain combination of apostrophes as genuine apostrophes and italics together, which will prevent the italics from terminating correctly. I thought that maybe people encountered that and used this code instead. No idea... --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:25, 31 July 2007 (CDT)
| |
| ::::Yeah, the purpose of the unicode thing (&#39;) is so that you could write something like ''Galactica'''s without causing formatting issues, basically having the wrong things italicized because it's confused about where the terminating tag actually is in a sentence or paragraph.-- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:31, 31 July 2007 (CDT)
| |
| :::::I see. Thank you Joe, and thank you Serenity... BTW, I was trying so hard to get '''&#39;s''' to show up on screen. As you see I did not succeed :p -- [[User:Veepz|Veepz]] 16:38, 31 July 2007 (CDT)
| |