Editing Template talk:WWW High Traffic
Discussion page of Template:WWW High Traffic
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Are there even known instances of high traffic sites linking to a BSWiki article? If so, that would be cool (and I would've completely missed it). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]] 09:36, 14 February 2007 (CST) | Are there even known instances of high traffic sites linking to a BSWiki article? If so, that would be cool (and I would've completely missed it). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]] 09:36, 14 February 2007 (CST) | ||
:Shane was looking at the stats for the website and noted that we had been linked in a [http://www.digg.com/television/BATTLESTAR_GALACTICA_to_get_a_Fourth_Season Digg.com discussion] and from a (apparently high traffic?) [http://www.warpsection.com/2007/the-final-five/ blog]. While Shane has been known to stay ahead of the curve, in this case it's more reactive than proactive (though it's good to have in place should we ever get slashdotted, etc.) --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 09:43, 14 February 2007 (CST) | :Shane was looking at the stats for the website and noted that we had been linked in a [http://www.digg.com/television/BATTLESTAR_GALACTICA_to_get_a_Fourth_Season Digg.com discussion] and from a (apparently high traffic?) [http://www.warpsection.com/2007/the-final-five/ blog]. While Shane has been known to stay ahead of the curve, in this case it's more reactive than proactive (though it's good to have in place should we ever get slashdotted, etc.) --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 09:43, 14 February 2007 (CST) | ||