Editing Template talk:POV Real
Discussion page of Template:POV Real
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hey, I created the MA real world template after I got the idea from Wookieepedia's "era icons" like the ones in [http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Anakin_Skywalker this article]. I once tried to make an icon system at MA where real, featured, shortcut, policy, and whatever else, would all be integrated in a system and then articles would have a template call like <nowiki>{{icons|featured|real}}</nowiki>. The idea was never accepted. The biggest problem was with long titles. | Hey, I created the MA real world template after I got the idea from Wookieepedia's "era icons" like the ones in [http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Anakin_Skywalker this article]. I once tried to make an icon system at MA where real, featured, shortcut, policy, and whatever else, would all be integrated in a system and then articles would have a template call like <nowiki>{{icons|featured|real}}</nowiki>. The idea was never accepted. The biggest problem was with long titles. | ||
| Line 46: | Line 44: | ||
# [[User:OTW|OTW]] - {{vd}} [[User:OTW|OTW]] 16:19, 9 December 2007 (CST) | # [[User:OTW|OTW]] - {{vd}} [[User:OTW|OTW]] 16:19, 9 December 2007 (CST) | ||
:*{{comment}} The other vote is about the RPOV policy. The policy itself is sound. We still shouldn't freely mix in- and out-of-universe references with an article, but use separate sections and footnotes instead. It's just the template that is rather pointless. We have always enforced the policy, so the voting is just a formal thing. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:22, 9 December 2007 (CST) | :*{{comment}} The other vote is about the RPOV policy. The policy itself is sound. We still shouldn't freely mix in- and out-of-universe references with an article, but use separate sections and footnotes instead. It's just the template that is rather pointless. We have always enforced the policy, so the voting is just a formal thing. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:22, 9 December 2007 (CST) | ||