| Display title | Talk:Viper Mark VII/Archive 1 |
| Default sort key | Viper Mark VII/Archive 1 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 3,613 |
| Namespace ID | 1 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 15443 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | David Templar (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 16:40, 10 April 2007 |
| Latest editor | David cgc (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 00:31, 14 February 2013 |
| Total number of edits | 6 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Sci-Fi Channel on Mk VII retrofitting and handling
The Sci-Fi Channel link's dead, I think it's been dead for a while. Looks like Sci-Fi Channel has decided it doesn't need its own commentary page about the technical aspects of the BSG universe anymore. So what now? Would that bit about the Mk VII being harder to fly because of a lobotomy finally be removed off BSGWiki, or would we simply put up a "dead link" road sign? Personally, I've been arguing about the unlikelihood/uncanonacy/illogic-ness of Sci-Fi Channel's statement since day one, so I'm definately in favour of striking it completely. I know the page going down doesn't automatically equal retraction of the statement, but I'd think the series itself has provided amble evidence to the contrary of Mk VIIs being difficult to handle and only flown by the most experienced pilots. --David Templar 11:40, 10 April 2007 (CDT) |
