Editing Talk:Louis Hoshi/Archive 1
Discussion page of Louis Hoshi/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::: Er, forgive my ignorance, but what the heck is Gateworld? I mean--how reliable are they as a source? Are they connected in some capacity to RDM or Universal or the SciFi Channel or something? I mean--citing sources is great, but part of the point is that they be ''reliable'' sources. Forgive me if I am calling foul on an acceptable source. --[[User:Day|Day]] 16:21, 6 October 2005 (EDT) | ::: Er, forgive my ignorance, but what the heck is Gateworld? I mean--how reliable are they as a source? Are they connected in some capacity to RDM or Universal or the SciFi Channel or something? I mean--citing sources is great, but part of the point is that they be ''reliable'' sources. Forgive me if I am calling foul on an acceptable source. --[[User:Day|Day]] 16:21, 6 October 2005 (EDT) | ||
::::They're a stargate fansite that occasionally posts BSG spoilers. They've been fairly accurate in the past, but I agree that the intersection between spoiler "sources" and regular episode sources is problematic. --[[User: | ::::They're a stargate fansite that occasionally posts BSG spoilers. They've been fairly accurate in the past, but I agree that the intersection between spoiler "sources" and regular episode sources is problematic. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 17:08, 6 October 2005 (EDT) | ||
I still think this article should go. Are we waiting for the extended version to come out on DVD (i.e. another half-season and some?) or has this merely dropped from the radar? The way I see it, if some Hoshi shows up in the ''Pegasus'' CIC in ''[[Resurrection Ship, Part I]]'' or ''[[Resurrection Ship, Part II|II]]'', we could always re-create the article. As it stands, I think it should go. --[[User:Day|Day]] 00:43, 2 January 2006 (EST) | I still think this article should go. Are we waiting for the extended version to come out on DVD (i.e. another half-season and some?) or has this merely dropped from the radar? The way I see it, if some Hoshi shows up in the ''Pegasus'' CIC in ''[[Resurrection Ship, Part I]]'' or ''[[Resurrection Ship, Part II|II]]'', we could always re-create the article. As it stands, I think it should go. --[[User:Day|Day]] 00:43, 2 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:Agree. I do think we should give Kahran or another interested party 24 hours to defend its existance, though. Tagging for deletion. --[[User: | :Agree. I do think we should give Kahran or another interested party 24 hours to defend its existance, though. Tagging for deletion. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:37, 2 January 2006 (EST) | ||
== Older Discussion == | == Older Discussion == | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
No. Linda Park was Japanese, Grace Park is Korean. These are two distinct things. That, and Lt. Hoshi on Enterpise was a complete non-entity, as were all of the other supporting characters. ---Ricimer, 17 Sept, 2005 | No. Linda Park was Japanese, Grace Park is Korean. These are two distinct things. That, and Lt. Hoshi on Enterpise was a complete non-entity, as were all of the other supporting characters. ---Ricimer, 17 Sept, 2005 | ||
Was this guy actually in the episode? --[[User: | Was this guy actually in the episode? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:43, 24 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
:Well, they didn't walk around and say the name of each of ''Pegasus' '' CIC crew, but it could have been the unamed tactical officer, or someone else. They might turn up in later episodes ---Ricimer, 24, Sept 2005 | :Well, they didn't walk around and say the name of each of ''Pegasus' '' CIC crew, but it could have been the unamed tactical officer, or someone else. They might turn up in later episodes ---Ricimer, 24, Sept 2005 | ||
::I don't know why we should have an article for a character without a mention ''or'' an actor. --[[User: | ::I don't know why we should have an article for a character without a mention ''or'' an actor. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:55, 24 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
***Then you shouldn't concern yourself about such articles. [[User:Kuralyov|Kuralyov]] 17:04, 24 September 2005 (EDT) | ***Then you shouldn't concern yourself about such articles. [[User:Kuralyov|Kuralyov]] 17:04, 24 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
::::Perhaps you might try to enlighten me. --[[User: | ::::Perhaps you might try to enlighten me. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 17:06, 24 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
::::: Seeing no reason to have articles about characters without mention or actor/-ress, isn't a good reason to ignore the creation of such articles. I mean--there's never a mention of Petty Officer Luke Skywalker. Neither do we know who plays his part. Maybe we should make a page about him, too. That example is a bit extreme, perhaps, but there's no source cited for this and, as a member of the [[Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad|Citation Jihad]], I'd like to see one. I think this page should go. Also, I still find the use of bullets rather than tabs to be disruptive formatting, which is to say it distracts my eye from reading the words, rather than helping. --[[User:Day|Day]] 23:35, 3 October 2005 (EDT) | ::::: Seeing no reason to have articles about characters without mention or actor/-ress, isn't a good reason to ignore the creation of such articles. I mean--there's never a mention of Petty Officer Luke Skywalker. Neither do we know who plays his part. Maybe we should make a page about him, too. That example is a bit extreme, perhaps, but there's no source cited for this and, as a member of the [[Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad|Citation Jihad]], I'd like to see one. I think this page should go. Also, I still find the use of bullets rather than tabs to be disruptive formatting, which is to say it distracts my eye from reading the words, rather than helping. --[[User:Day|Day]] 23:35, 3 October 2005 (EDT) | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
: As far as I can tell there's not even an authoritative source on this ''character'', let alone his/her rank. --[[User:Day|Day]] 00:36, 2 January 2006 (EST) | : As far as I can tell there's not even an authoritative source on this ''character'', let alone his/her rank. --[[User:Day|Day]] 00:36, 2 January 2006 (EST) | ||
Reopening this line of questioning - it's clear that his role is closer to Dualla's than Gaeta. Dee is enlisted, Gaeta is comissioned - which is Hoshi? --[[User: | Reopening this line of questioning - it's clear that his role is closer to Dualla's than Gaeta. Dee is enlisted, Gaeta is comissioned - which is Hoshi? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 23:17, 23 February 2006 (EST) | ||
== Update == | == Update == | ||