More actions
Basic information
| Display title | Talk:Lion's Head beacon/Archive 1 |
| Default sort key | Lion's Head beacon/Archive 1 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 2,603 |
| Namespace ID | 1 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 14672 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | Grugnir (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 19:01, 13 February 2007 |
| Latest editor | Akagi (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 17:41, 2 January 2008 |
| Total number of edits | 5 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The colonials conclude that the beacon was a result of "accidental exposure" but, given that the beacon "appears to have gelatinous material within slats in its interior," this may raise a rather interesting question. Microbiological cultures and specimens are often kept and preserved in what could be described as "gelatinous material." So, was the contamination really accidental or was the dying Six on the basestar correct when she described it as "left behind by some humans to destroy us?" |