Editing Talk:Frak/Archive 1
Discussion page of Frak/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I felt that we could keep the tone of the article to a "PG"-ish rating by avoiding the direct use of our real-world counterpart curse, even as a link. There's enough there for the average Joe to know the origin of the word. I also rewrote the article with better clarify of examples from actual dialogue. The Re-imagined Series is intended for adults, per RDM, but we should make an effort to avoid the use of actual profanity in articles if the phrase(s) do not explicitly appear in aired dialogue (which, in turn, acknowledges acceptance of it for public consumption per broadcast practices and FCC regulations). The use of the term in BSG is so amusing to me that sometimes I think we should classify this page as a Silly Page. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 11:42, 30 December 2005 (EST) | I felt that we could keep the tone of the article to a "PG"-ish rating by avoiding the direct use of our real-world counterpart curse, even as a link. There's enough there for the average Joe to know the origin of the word. I also rewrote the article with better clarify of examples from actual dialogue. The Re-imagined Series is intended for adults, per RDM, but we should make an effort to avoid the use of actual profanity in articles if the phrase(s) do not explicitly appear in aired dialogue (which, in turn, acknowledges acceptance of it for public consumption per broadcast practices and FCC regulations). The use of the term in BSG is so amusing to me that sometimes I think we should classify this page as a Silly Page. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 11:42, 30 December 2005 (EST) | ||
:Disagree. It is disingenuous ''not'' to mention "Fuck", on which "Frack" is quite obviously based. --[[User: | :Disagree. It is disingenuous ''not'' to mention "Fuck", on which "Frack" is quite obviously based. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 11:46, 30 December 2005 (EST) | ||
:I disagree as well. Meaning is lost by dodging around it. "Frak" has a variety of uses that are immediately clear as a parallel, but "don't care who he fraks" doesn't make sense or convey its meaning without understanding that "frak" stands in for "fuck." --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 12:18, 30 December 2005 (EST) | :I disagree as well. Meaning is lost by dodging around it. "Frak" has a variety of uses that are immediately clear as a parallel, but "don't care who he fraks" doesn't make sense or convey its meaning without understanding that "frak" stands in for "fuck." --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 12:18, 30 December 2005 (EST) | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
:::::::Specifically, the quote is, "What happened? He did exactly what you told him to do, Captain. Him and Duck had bingo fuel and a head start home, but instead the FNG turned and attacked. And Scar lit him up like a pinwheel." FNG is, not surprisingly, real-world military slang. Kat pronounces it "foon-ji." --[[User:Slander|Slander]] 14:41, 1 September 2007 (CDT) | :::::::Specifically, the quote is, "What happened? He did exactly what you told him to do, Captain. Him and Duck had bingo fuel and a head start home, but instead the FNG turned and attacked. And Scar lit him up like a pinwheel." FNG is, not surprisingly, real-world military slang. Kat pronounces it "foon-ji." --[[User:Slander|Slander]] 14:41, 1 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
:::::::Not so much slurring, but it's really pronounced as one word. Like "asap". That's why I missed it. I never recognized it as acronym, before it was brought up here. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 17:25, 1 September 2007 (CDT) | :::::::Not so much slurring, but it's really pronounced as one word. Like "asap". That's why I missed it. I never recognized it as acronym, before it was brought up here. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 17:25, 1 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
=="Frakking Toasters" and Jurisprudences of Technology: The Exception, the Subject and Techné in Battlestar Galactica== | =="Frakking Toasters" and Jurisprudences of Technology: The Exception, the Subject and Techné in Battlestar Galactica== | ||
Any registered to this site that can tell us whats in this document? http://caliber.ucpress.net/doi/abs/10.1525/lal.2007.19.1.45 --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 13:27, 14 September 2007 (CDT) | Any registered to this site that can tell us whats in this document? http://caliber.ucpress.net/doi/abs/10.1525/lal.2007.19.1.45 --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 13:27, 14 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
: In the off-chance I might be able to get the article, I signed up for an account on the site. However, I am still denied access to it. Apparently, you have to purchase the article. I dunno how much the article is, or if it's even worth getting, but I can (with the proceeds from Amazon.com commissions) buy the article, if it's wanted. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 13:50, 14 September 2007 (CDT) | : In the off-chance I might be able to get the article, I signed up for an account on the site. However, I am still denied access to it. Apparently, you have to purchase the article. I dunno how much the article is, or if it's even worth getting, but I can (with the proceeds from Amazon.com commissions) buy the article, if it's wanted. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 13:50, 14 September 2007 (CDT) | ||