Editing Talk:Frak/Archive 1
Discussion page of Frak/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
::grrzw, you are correct on the issue of regulation, but perhaps not on its effect. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cable_TV makes it clear that the FCC has authority over cable television; it also makes it clear that the FCC does not regulate the content of cable programs, since they (in principle) require special equipment/access to see. Content regulation of cable stations still exists, of course; it's just driven by advertising interests and fear of protests. In any case, syndication on the major networks is worth a lot of money, and even the possiblity of such is worth more than enough to push them to filter their language. Yes, they could dub it for syndication, but it's a bother and makes them look like they bowdlerized themselves. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 01:02, 17 January 2006 (EST) | ::grrzw, you are correct on the issue of regulation, but perhaps not on its effect. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cable_TV makes it clear that the FCC has authority over cable television; it also makes it clear that the FCC does not regulate the content of cable programs, since they (in principle) require special equipment/access to see. Content regulation of cable stations still exists, of course; it's just driven by advertising interests and fear of protests. In any case, syndication on the major networks is worth a lot of money, and even the possiblity of such is worth more than enough to push them to filter their language. Yes, they could dub it for syndication, but it's a bother and makes them look like they bowdlerized themselves. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 01:02, 17 January 2006 (EST) | ||
==Who said what...?== | ==Who said what...?== | ||