Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Editing Talk:Computers in the Re-imagined Series/Archive 1

Discussion page of Computers in the Re-imagined Series/Archive 1
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 7: Line 7:
Merv, please let others chime in before removing a merge request. The article is long and such a new article shortens this one. I rolled back your removal of Shane's tag for this reason. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:41, 23 May 2006 (CDT)
Merv, please let others chime in before removing a merge request. The article is long and such a new article shortens this one. I rolled back your removal of Shane's tag for this reason. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:41, 23 May 2006 (CDT)


:Not to defend Merv's hasty action, but I also think that a split would be more confusing than helpful. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 17:08, 23 May 2006 (CDT)
:Not to defend Merv's hasty action, but I also think that a split would be more confusing than helpful. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 17:08, 23 May 2006 (CDT)


::Sorry I was just looking through and on closer inspection you were right: this page has been getting kind of long.  Shouldn't have deleted that.  On the other hand I agree with Peter that it would get kind of confusing. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 18:24, 23 May 2006 (CDT)
::Sorry I was just looking through and on closer inspection you were right: this page has been getting kind of long.  Shouldn't have deleted that.  On the other hand I agree with Peter that it would get kind of confusing. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 18:24, 23 May 2006 (CDT)
Line 13: Line 13:
:::''Main article called [[Comupter History]]''
:::''Main article called [[Comupter History]]''
:::...so people would goto that page to read the full article. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 20:43, 23 May 2006 (CDT)
:::...so people would goto that page to read the full article. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 20:43, 23 May 2006 (CDT)
::::That sounds good. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 22:32, 23 May 2006 (CDT)
::::That sounds good. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:32, 23 May 2006 (CDT)
::::Concur. Feel free to do so if I don't get around to it sometime soon. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:29, 24 May 2006 (CDT)
::::Concur. Feel free to do so if I don't get around to it sometime soon. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:29, 24 May 2006 (CDT)


Line 20: Line 20:
Okay, we've now got pics of all the major Battlestar Computers, however there are two pics for the Damage Control computer, one for Pegasus and one for Galactca. Granted the two show the differences between the different ships technologies, however, is it really necessary to have both of them here on this page, as opposed to one (suggest pegasus one for better thumbnail size), for reference purposes? --[[User:Fordsierra4x4|Fordsierra4x4]] 16:26, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
Okay, we've now got pics of all the major Battlestar Computers, however there are two pics for the Damage Control computer, one for Pegasus and one for Galactca. Granted the two show the differences between the different ships technologies, however, is it really necessary to have both of them here on this page, as opposed to one (suggest pegasus one for better thumbnail size), for reference purposes? --[[User:Fordsierra4x4|Fordsierra4x4]] 16:26, 25 May 2006 (CDT)


:I'd prefer them together. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 17:42, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
:I'd prefer them together. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 17:42, 25 May 2006 (CDT)


::Okay, fair enough - but could the article not be formatted in such a way that the thumbnails correspond with the specific subheadings - ie - in a table format or something cause the article is starting to look messy :( --[[User:Fordsierra4x4|Fordsierra4x4]] 18:00, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
::Okay, fair enough - but could the article not be formatted in such a way that the thumbnails correspond with the specific subheadings - ie - in a table format or something cause the article is starting to look messy :( --[[User:Fordsierra4x4|Fordsierra4x4]] 18:00, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
Line 26: Line 26:
:::I took a stab at using wikitables to do what you suggested. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 18:13, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
:::I took a stab at using wikitables to do what you suggested. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 18:13, 25 May 2006 (CDT)


::::Looks dire to me. What's wrong with stacking them? --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 19:09, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
::::Looks dire to me. What's wrong with stacking them? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:09, 25 May 2006 (CDT)


::::Looks pretty good actually, the only thing wrong is like i said, the DC computer pictures - do we *REALLY* need to have *BOTH* of them there? After all, this isnt a comparison between the two battlestars, just a representation of the systems on both. --[[User:Fordsierra4x4|Fordsierra4x4]] 19:45, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
::::Looks pretty good actually, the only thing wrong is like i said, the DC computer pictures - do we *REALLY* need to have *BOTH* of them there? After all, this isnt a comparison between the two battlestars, just a representation of the systems on both. --[[User:Fordsierra4x4|Fordsierra4x4]] 19:45, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
Line 63: Line 63:
:True. That scene is in the extended cut. I'd have to check, but those are round I think. But they could still be included here. It's late in the night now, but I can try getting a screenshot later. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:35, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
:True. That scene is in the extended cut. I'd have to check, but those are round I think. But they could still be included here. It's late in the night now, but I can try getting a screenshot later. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:35, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
::I've not seen that version, so if that was the media that Pegasus gave, then yep, get rid of that sentence. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 20:33, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
::I've not seen that version, so if that was the media that Pegasus gave, then yep, get rid of that sentence. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 20:33, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
I checked it. There are both octagonal (in single jewel cases) and round discs (on a spindle). Gaeta takes on of the octagonal discs, but then it appears to be round in his hands. But that could just be the light. Obviously there is a lot of reflection from it. Pics are [[:Image:PegDataDisc1.jpg|here]] and [[:Image:PegDataDisc2.jpg|here]] --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 07:53, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

To edit this page, please enter the words that appear below in the box (more info):

Refresh
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

  [] · [[]] · [[|]] · {{}} · · “” ‘’ «» ‹› „“ ‚‘ · ~ | ° &nbsp; · ± × ÷ ² ³ ½ · §
     [[Category:]] · [[:File:]] · [[Special:MyLanguage/]] · <code></code> · <nowiki></nowiki> <code><nowiki></nowiki></code> · <syntaxhighlight></syntaxhighlight> · <includeonly></includeonly> · <noinclude></noinclude> · #REDIRECT[[]] · <translate></translate> · <languages/> · {{#translation:}} · <tvar|></> · {{DEFAULTSORT:}} · <categorytree></categorytree> · <div style="clear:both;"></div> <s></s>


Your changes will be visible immediately.
  • For testing, please use the sandbox instead.
  • On talk pages, please sign your comment by typing four tildes (~~~~).