Editing Talk:Computers in the Re-imagined Series/Archive 1
Discussion page of Computers in the Re-imagined Series/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Merv, please let others chime in before removing a merge request. The article is long and such a new article shortens this one. I rolled back your removal of Shane's tag for this reason. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:41, 23 May 2006 (CDT) | Merv, please let others chime in before removing a merge request. The article is long and such a new article shortens this one. I rolled back your removal of Shane's tag for this reason. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:41, 23 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
:Not to defend Merv's hasty action, but I also think that a split would be more confusing than helpful. --[[User: | :Not to defend Merv's hasty action, but I also think that a split would be more confusing than helpful. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 17:08, 23 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::Sorry I was just looking through and on closer inspection you were right: this page has been getting kind of long. Shouldn't have deleted that. On the other hand I agree with Peter that it would get kind of confusing. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 18:24, 23 May 2006 (CDT) | ::Sorry I was just looking through and on closer inspection you were right: this page has been getting kind of long. Shouldn't have deleted that. On the other hand I agree with Peter that it would get kind of confusing. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 18:24, 23 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:::''Main article called [[Comupter History]]'' | :::''Main article called [[Comupter History]]'' | ||
:::...so people would goto that page to read the full article. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 20:43, 23 May 2006 (CDT) | :::...so people would goto that page to read the full article. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 20:43, 23 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::That sounds good. --[[User: | ::::That sounds good. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:32, 23 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::Concur. Feel free to do so if I don't get around to it sometime soon. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:29, 24 May 2006 (CDT) | ::::Concur. Feel free to do so if I don't get around to it sometime soon. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:29, 24 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Okay, we've now got pics of all the major Battlestar Computers, however there are two pics for the Damage Control computer, one for Pegasus and one for Galactca. Granted the two show the differences between the different ships technologies, however, is it really necessary to have both of them here on this page, as opposed to one (suggest pegasus one for better thumbnail size), for reference purposes? --[[User:Fordsierra4x4|Fordsierra4x4]] 16:26, 25 May 2006 (CDT) | Okay, we've now got pics of all the major Battlestar Computers, however there are two pics for the Damage Control computer, one for Pegasus and one for Galactca. Granted the two show the differences between the different ships technologies, however, is it really necessary to have both of them here on this page, as opposed to one (suggest pegasus one for better thumbnail size), for reference purposes? --[[User:Fordsierra4x4|Fordsierra4x4]] 16:26, 25 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
:I'd prefer them together. --[[User: | :I'd prefer them together. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 17:42, 25 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::Okay, fair enough - but could the article not be formatted in such a way that the thumbnails correspond with the specific subheadings - ie - in a table format or something cause the article is starting to look messy :( --[[User:Fordsierra4x4|Fordsierra4x4]] 18:00, 25 May 2006 (CDT) | ::Okay, fair enough - but could the article not be formatted in such a way that the thumbnails correspond with the specific subheadings - ie - in a table format or something cause the article is starting to look messy :( --[[User:Fordsierra4x4|Fordsierra4x4]] 18:00, 25 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
:::I took a stab at using wikitables to do what you suggested. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 18:13, 25 May 2006 (CDT) | :::I took a stab at using wikitables to do what you suggested. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 18:13, 25 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::Looks dire to me. What's wrong with stacking them? --[[User: | ::::Looks dire to me. What's wrong with stacking them? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:09, 25 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::Looks pretty good actually, the only thing wrong is like i said, the DC computer pictures - do we *REALLY* need to have *BOTH* of them there? After all, this isnt a comparison between the two battlestars, just a representation of the systems on both. --[[User:Fordsierra4x4|Fordsierra4x4]] 19:45, 25 May 2006 (CDT) | ::::Looks pretty good actually, the only thing wrong is like i said, the DC computer pictures - do we *REALLY* need to have *BOTH* of them there? After all, this isnt a comparison between the two battlestars, just a representation of the systems on both. --[[User:Fordsierra4x4|Fordsierra4x4]] 19:45, 25 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
:True. That scene is in the extended cut. I'd have to check, but those are round I think. But they could still be included here. It's late in the night now, but I can try getting a screenshot later. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:35, 16 May 2007 (CDT) | :True. That scene is in the extended cut. I'd have to check, but those are round I think. But they could still be included here. It's late in the night now, but I can try getting a screenshot later. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:35, 16 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
::I've not seen that version, so if that was the media that Pegasus gave, then yep, get rid of that sentence. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 20:33, 16 May 2007 (CDT) | ::I've not seen that version, so if that was the media that Pegasus gave, then yep, get rid of that sentence. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 20:33, 16 May 2007 (CDT) | ||