Editing Portal talk:Ships
Discussion page of Portal:Ships
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I agree with you Merovingian, I think we should put the ships of the cylons (Basestar, raider, heavy raider, ressurection ship, etc.) | I agree with you Merovingian, I think we should put the ships of the cylons (Basestar, raider, heavy raider, ressurection ship, etc.) | ||
There are 2 options, either put the cylon ships in the cylon portal, or put it in the ship portal: | There are 2 options, either put the cylon ships in the cylon portal, or put it in the ship portal: | ||
: 1. (Ship Portal) If we were to put it in the ship portal, then we would have to edit the the portal to include two sections in it like: Colonial and Cylon, and then have all of the colonial ships, and then all of the cylon ships. | : 1. (Ship Portal) If we were to put it in the ship portal, then we would have to edit the the portal to include two sections in it like: Colonial and Cylon, and then have all of the colonial ships, and then all of the cylon ships. | ||
: 2. (Cylon Portal) With this idea of putting it on the cylon portal, maybe you could in the cylon portal have Cylon Models "Cylon Models of the Original Series" (model 0005) and have "Cylon Models of the Re-imaged Series" as sub heading/level 2 headings (also add the CGI Model); and then have Cylon Ships ; "Cylon Ships of the Original Series" (model 0005) and have "Cylon Ships of the Re-imaged Series" which would include (Basestar, raider, heavy raider, ressurection ship, etc.). | : 2. (Cylon Portal) With this idea of putting it on the cylon portal, maybe you could in the cylon portal have Cylon Models "Cylon Models of the Original Series" (model 0005) and have "Cylon Models of the Re-imaged Series" as sub heading/level 2 headings (also add the CGI Model); and then have Cylon Ships ; "Cylon Ships of the Original Series" (model 0005) and have "Cylon Ships of the Re-imaged Series" which would include (Basestar, raider, heavy raider, ressurection ship, etc.). | ||
But with this idea with putting it in the cylon portal, would be too much as you have already said. so i agree with putting it in the ships portal. | But with this idea with putting it in the cylon portal, would be too much as you have already said. so i agree with putting it in the ships portal. | ||
I also think we should also have the viper mark 1, mark vii, and the raptor in the ships part currently now, as those ships are the integral part of the whole of the show.--[[User:Lgamser|Lgamser]] 22:13, 4 June 2006 (CDT) | I also think we should also have the viper mark 1, mark vii, and the raptor in the ships part currently now, as those ships are the integral part of the whole of the show.--[[User:Lgamser|Lgamser]] 22:13, 4 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 18: | ||
I have put the viper mark 11 and v11 and the raptor on the portal, what do you guys think?... i think we should get another better image of the viper mark 11, it doesn't fit in well with the white background--[[User:Lgamser|Lgamser]] 23:15, 4 June 2006 (CDT) | I have put the viper mark 11 and v11 and the raptor on the portal, what do you guys think?... i think we should get another better image of the viper mark 11, it doesn't fit in well with the white background--[[User:Lgamser|Lgamser]] 23:15, 4 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
also, the the top article where the image bsg-bsg-1 image, this does not get displayed, if you go into the section, it will display the picture properly, but not in the portal view, same with the astral queen section.--[[User:Lgamser|Lgamser]] 23:20, 4 June 2006 (CDT) | |||
:You can always do the "purge server" link on the bottom right and that resets the server cashe. This is usefull for portals and subpages. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 23:22, 4 June 2006 (CDT) | |||
purging server cache does NOT prove successful!--[[User:Lgamser|Lgamser]] 23:36, 4 June 2006 (CDT) | |||