Editing Podcast:The Ties That Bind
From the only original and legitimate Battlestar Wiki: the free-as-in-beer, non-corporate, open-content encyclopedia, analytical reference, and episode guide on all things Battlestar Galactica. Accept neither subpar substitutes nor subpar clones.
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
Act three. All that thumping and banging in the background is of course my children on the floor directly above my head. I think this was structured differently in the script. I think the previous act out was not an act out and I think we sort of cut back into the scene in the same act and kept going. I think I restructured this in the editing room, I could be wrong –someone I’m sure will correct me from the production team. But I think I restructured this in the editing room, to make that the act out and come back here, at the top. Again, going to Anders, because it’s like well what’s going on in his brain as he hears all this stuff. Again this was another scene that was chock full of Centurions initially. That’s why you had that big wide shot there at the end, because we had spotted Centurions all the way around the room and I don’t know if they were doing quite as much acting and reacting in this scene as in the prior one but they were more characters within the scene in the original cut –which explains the odd grouping here at the table where you have these four at the very big table at the center of the room and so much wide space around them. You'll notice that I am cutting to angles that are so tight that… they would avoid places where- they were avoiding camera compositions where Michael had left room for the centurions to play in the background, is the most elegant way of stating it. So, essentially, by cutting the Centurions out I screwed up [[Michael Nankin]]’s blocking [laughs] and they way he designed to shoot this. One of the evil things that producers do to directors that inspires mutual hatred by all parties. And I felt bad, because Michael Nankin is one of our best directors and the problems in the episode, as usual, were all traceable back to the story and script level and they were mostly things that I was struggling with and having problems with. They weren’t really the fault of the director. | Act three. All that thumping and banging in the background is of course my children on the floor directly above my head. I think this was structured differently in the script. I think the previous act out was not an act out and I think we sort of cut back into the scene in the same act and kept going. I think I restructured this in the editing room, I could be wrong –someone I’m sure will correct me from the production team. But I think I restructured this in the editing room, to make that the act out and come back here, at the top. Again, going to Anders, because it’s like well what’s going on in his brain as he hears all this stuff. Again this was another scene that was chock full of Centurions initially. That’s why you had that big wide shot there at the end, because we had spotted Centurions all the way around the room and I don’t know if they were doing quite as much acting and reacting in this scene as in the prior one but they were more characters within the scene in the original cut –which explains the odd grouping here at the table where you have these four at the very big table at the center of the room and so much wide space around them. You'll notice that I am cutting to angles that are so tight that… they would avoid places where- they were avoiding camera compositions where Michael had left room for the centurions to play in the background, is the most elegant way of stating it. So, essentially, by cutting the Centurions out I screwed up [[Michael Nankin]]’s blocking [laughs] and they way he designed to shoot this. One of the evil things that producers do to directors that inspires mutual hatred by all parties. And I felt bad, because Michael Nankin is one of our best directors and the problems in the episode, as usual, were all traceable back to the story and script level and they were mostly things that I was struggling with and having problems with. They weren’t really the fault of the director. | ||
Here’s the scene. This is the first [[Quorum of Twelve (RDM)|Quorum]] scene. I really tortured [[Michael Taylor]] about this scene. Over and over again, kept taking different takes at it. [[Jane Espenson]], who wrote a subsequent episode, had cracked the back of a Quorum scene and doing Question Time and I kept referring Michael to her draft. Saying, look at how Jane did it! Which was just driving him insane, of course, because no writer wants to hear that, go look at somebody else’s draft. Again, we are going to a House of Commons feel here, there’s even two sides to the room; in | Here’s the scene. This is the first [[Quorum of Twelve (RDM)|Quorum]] scene. I really tortured [[Michael Taylor]] about this scene. Over and over again, kept taking different takes at it. [[Jane Espenson]], who wrote a subsequent episode, had cracked the back of a Quorum scene and doing Question Time and I kept referring Michael to her draft. Saying, look at how Jane did it! Which was just driving him insane, of course, because no writer wants to hear that, go look at somebody else’s draft. Again, we are going to a House of Commons feel here, there’s even two sides to the room; in House of Commons it’s the two parties, here it’s arbitrary, it’s just two sides of the Colonies –it is a nice way to delineate the two sides of the room. I liked that a delegate has to stand, there’s a formality to how they address one another --my friend, the delegate from so-and-so does not the president feel that—I like all that quite a bit in the way it all flows into one another. And just that shot there of Laura putting her head on her hand and what a pain in the ass this must be because presumably, all the way through the series, ever since the Quorum was established in "[[Colonial Day]]" these scenes have been going on off-camera. Laura, on ''[[Colonial One]]'', has had to deal with this civilian [[government]] that she brought into being --the representatives of the people out there. | ||
The storyline became that Lee, in his first session at the Quorum, tries to go to Laura’s defense. Tries to step in and lend her a hand and lend his political support to her and that Laura, though, really isn’t going to have any of that. Because I think, on some level, she really is still pissed at what he did | The storyline became that Lee, in his first session at the Quorum, tries to go to Laura’s defense. Tries to step in and lend her a hand and lend his political support to her and that Laura, though, really isn’t going to have any of that. Because I think, on some level, she really is still pissed at what he did in Baltar’s trial, despite her denials to the contrary. She gets up and just swats him back down in a very public way. That way always the key to me, that Laura just reached up and smacked him and kind of got an enemy out of it. Not an enemy like someone like Zarak, but certainly Lee then gets up and proves his mettle and shows that he has teeth too. And this notion that Laura was considering going into these tribunals that were appointed by her and they were controlled by her, was obviously a nod towards current events and tendencies of the executive branch to want to control things. I don’t think that it’s something unique to the Bush administration, to put a name to it, I think the executive branch tends to reach for more and more power. Certainly, in emergency situations, it grabs all the power it possibly can, mostly out of good intentions and mostly out of a need to try to control events, to try to do good, to try to have more efficient government, to try to protect the people, to try to preserve security, etc etc. I wanted to play some of that. Laura is not above doing certain things. Laura is not above arrogating more and more power to herself. Laura is not above trying to then control the judiciary, especially given the fact that the judiciary, such as it was, was the very thing that allowed Gaius Baltar of all people to be exonerated at the end of last season. So, it made perfect sense to me that Laura would be looking for a way to correct that particular flaw in their system and would then try to do it without bringing it to a public vote. And then Laura is smart enough and quick enough and nimble enough on her feet to realize that this isn’t going to go down well and that she deftly turns the tables and says I’ll bring it to a meeting and of course I was going to bring it to you all along, I just didn’t have a chance to do so. | ||
And here we have the beginning of the [[Cylon Civil War]]. This was a long time coming. We played a lot of different elements of this in building to this point and alluding to divisions but now here we go. When it is Cylon against Cylon it reminds me of [shouts] “Ape has killed ape! Ape has killed ape!” For those of you who are truly sci-fi geeks of course will recognize that [[w:Battle for the Planet of the Apes|reference]]. For the rest of you, I will leave it to you and to the glories of the Internet to search out that particular quotation. In any case, another little sequence I tortured [[Gary Hutzel]] about, it wasn’t clear to me which was which, which side was which in this scenario. Who had really fired on who and which were the Cavil’s guys and which were the good guys and I kept making them rearrange the geometry of it, ad infinitum. | And here we have the beginning of the [[Cylon Civil War]]. This was a long time coming. We played a lot of different elements of this in building to this point and alluding to divisions but now here we go. When it is Cylon against Cylon it reminds me of [shouts] “Ape has killed ape! Ape has killed ape!” For those of you who are truly sci-fi geeks of course will recognize that [[w:Battle for the Planet of the Apes|reference]]. For the rest of you, I will leave it to you and to the glories of the Internet to search out that particular quotation. In any case, another little sequence I tortured [[Gary Hutzel]] about, it wasn’t clear to me which was which, which side was which in this scenario. Who had really fired on who and which were the Cavil’s guys and which were the good guys and I kept making them rearrange the geometry of it, ad infinitum. | ||