Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Editing Podcast:The Son Also Rises

From the only original and legitimate Battlestar Wiki: the free-as-in-beer, non-corporate, open-content encyclopedia, analytical reference, and episode guide on all things Battlestar Galactica. Accept neither subpar substitutes nor subpar clones.
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 299: Line 299:
== Act 3 ==
== Act 3 ==
<!-- 21:28 -->
<!-- 21:28 -->
RDM: Top of the act. The plot of who ki- who's the bomber? Who's the mad bomber on [[Galactica (RDM)|''Galactica'']], interestingly enough, in the first draft, and in a lot of the drafts, actually, until we- until very far into prep, and maybe into shooting, we were gonna have the identity of the bomber- we weren't gonna reveal them on this episode. The end of the show was gonna be the bomber still with his hands- only identified by his bomb-making apparatus, and not know who he was, and keep him alive as a threat, and we were gonna keep him alive through the actual trial, and what was he gonna do? And it- became a problem because it's the old [[w:Alfred Hitchcock|Hitchcock]] thing, if you put a- if you show a gun, [[w:Chekhov's gun|you gotta use it by the end of the movie]], and to have this guy around and keep him as a threat and not have a bomb go off in the courtroom in the finale just became a problem, and I didn't want a bomb to go off in the courtroom at the end. It just felt like it was gilling it a bit. So we talked about revealing him as, what's his face? God, I hate it when I forget the characters' names. As [[Aaron Kelly|Kelly]]. As Captain Kelly. Revealing it as Kelly but not having Kelly hauled away, and then that just felt like it was the same thing. You still had the bomber on the loose, even though we were gonna have him put his bombmaking materials away, etc, as if he was done. But then we decide, you gotta resolve it. You gotta like have the guy found.
RDM: Top of the act. The plot of who ki- who's the bomber? Who's the mad bomber on [[Galactica (RDM)|''Galactica'']], interestingly enough, in the first draft, and in a lot of the drafts, actually, until we- until very far into prep, and maybe into shooting, we were gonna have the identity of the bomber- we weren't gonna reveal them on this episode. The end of the show was gonna be the bomber still with his hands- only identified by his bomb-making apparatus, and not know who he was, and keep him alive as a threat, and we were gonna keep him alive through the actual trial, and what was he gonna do? And it- became a problem because it's the old [[w:Alfred Hitchcock|Hitchcock]] thing, if you put a- if you show a gun, you gotta use it by the end of the movie, and to have this guy around and keep him as a threat and not have a bomb go off in the courtroom in the finale just became a problem, and I didn't want a bomb to go off in the courtroom at the end. It just felt like it was gilling it a bit. So we talked about revealing him as, what's his face? God, I hate it when I forget the characters' names. As [[Aaron Kelly|Kelly]]. As Captain Kelly. Revealing it as Kelly but not having Kelly hauled away, and then that just felt like it was the same thing. You still had the bomber on the loose, even though we were gonna have him put his bombmaking materials away, etc, as if he was done. But then we decide, you gotta resolve it. You gotta like have the guy found.


Now this is interesting, because this is- a question of when you cut to certain pieces. This piece, I advocated, of [[Gaius Baltar|Baltar]] looking for his pen, I opted to put before the scene with [[Caprica Six]]. Which tel- where it- in this placement, you're not sure what he's doing. What's he looking for? He's looking for something he's lost. And he's trying to fi- what have I lost? And you might surmise that it's a pen, but you might not. You're just puzzled over what's going on. And then in the next sequence, when you get into the scene with Caprica Six, or not the very next sequence, sorry, when you get to the Caprica Six interrogation scene, and Baltar- and [[Romo Lampkin|Lampkin]] gives her the pen and says that Baltar sent it, that it was a deliberative missive, you start to p- if you're a smart audience member, and I think our audience is quite smart, you might put it together and say, "Oh shit! He took it from Baltar. He didn't- Baltar didn't give him the pen. He's- he took it from the guy." In the original cut, and in the directors cut, that scene took place later. It was- you saw the scene with Lampkin and Caprica Six gives him the- he gives her the pen, and then after that you cut to Baltar looking for the pen, which also tells you that it was a lie, and that it was stolen, but it's after the fact, and it's just a question of where you want the emphasis to be with the audience. When do you want them to think about that. I thought it was interesting to have this ambiguous scene of Baltar looking for something, and not know what he's looking for, and not quite even understand where that falls into the drama, and that when you got into this scene with Caprica Six and Baltar- Caprica Six and Lampkin, that at that moment you might put it together and you might, in the middle of the scene, have a realization that Bal- that Lampkin is actually pulling a fast one on Caprica Six and that it's an added layer that the audience can discover, if they choose to discover- if they choose to think about it. If you go the other way, if you put that scene after the scene with Caprica Six, they don't really have a way of doing that, and essentially they believe what Lampkin is saying, and then after they go, "Ohhhh. It was all a ruse." But by placing it before the scene, it's you giving them an opportunity to figure it out, and to have the discovery mid-scene and to have a couple of things going on at the same time. Anyway, that's an elaborate explanation for and editing choice, but that's what we did and why.
Now this is interesting, because this is- a question of when you cut to certain pieces. This piece, I advocated, of [[Gaius Baltar|Baltar]] looking for his pen, I opted to put before the scene with [[Caprica Six]]. Which tel- where it- in this placement, you're not sure what he's doing. What's he looking for? He's looking for something he's lost. And he's trying to fi- what have I lost? And you might surmise that it's a pen, but you might not. You're just puzzled over what's going on. And then in the next sequence, when you get into the scene with Caprica Six, or not the very next sequence, sorry, when you get to the Caprica Six interrogation scene, and Baltar- and [[Romo Lampkin|Lampkin]] gives her the pen and says that Baltar sent it, that it was a deliberative missive, you start to p- if you're a smart audience member, and I think our audience is quite smart, you might put it together and say, "Oh shit! He took it from Baltar. He didn't- Baltar didn't give him the pen. He's- he took it from the guy." In the original cut, and in the directors cut, that scene took place later. It was- you saw the scene with Lampkin and Caprica Six gives him the- he gives her the pen, and then after that you cut to Baltar looking for the pen, which also tells you that it was a lie, and that it was stolen, but it's after the fact, and it's just a question of where you want the emphasis to be with the audience. When do you want them to think about that. I though ti was interesting to have this ambiguous scene of Baltar looking for something, and not know what he's looking for, and not quite even understand where that falls into the drama, and that when you got into this scene with Caprica Six and Baltar- Caprica Six and Lampkin, that at that moment you might put it together and you might, in the middle of the scene, have a realization that Bal- that Lampkin is actually pulling a fast one on Caprica Six and that it's an added layer that the audience can discover, if they choose to discover- if they choose to think about it. If you go the other way, if you put that scene after the scene with Caprica Six, they don't really have a way of doing that, and essentially they believe what Lampkin is saying, and then after they go, "Ohhhh. It was all a ruse." But by placing it before the scene, it's you giving them an opportunity to figure it out, and to have the discovery mid-scene and to have a couple of things going on at the same time. Anyway, that's an elaborate explanation for and editing choice, but that's what we did and why.


I'm very fond of this scene in this show. I love everyone's performance here. I think [[Tricia Helfer|Trish]] is playing it beautifully. I think [[Mark Sheppard|Mark]] is doing great. I like [[Laura Roslin|Laura]], [[Lee Adama|Lee]]- I mean, this is- one of those scenes that you look back on, after the show is over, after [[Battlestar Galactica (RDM)|the series]] is over, and you'll say, "Wow. What an amazing ensemble we have," because there's so much going on here, and so much of it is in subtext and the actors are all just really inside their characters and inside this scene and there's many competing agendas, and there's lots of different motivations and moments and I think the way Bob shot this is wonderful. I like the pace of this scene. I had to fight to preserve the pace of this scene, 'cause it's- it verges on the slow. And there are those who thought it was like watching paint dry, but I really like the slower scenes. I like this because it's really about character. This is really a scene about character and motivation, and love, and philosophy, and I think it's just a beautifully written piece of film, but I think it's really one of the better scenes in the show.
I'm very fond of this scene in this show. I love everyone's performance here. I think [[Tricia Helfer|Trish]] is playing it beautifully. I think [[Mark Sheppard|Mark]] is doing great. I like [[Laura Roslin|Laura]], [[Lee Adama|Lee]]- I mean, this is- one of those scenes that you look back on, after the show is over, after [[Battlestar Galactica (RDM)|the series]] is over, and you'll say, "Wow. What an amazing ensemble we have," because there's so much going on here, and so much of it is in subtext and the actors are all just really inside their characters and inside this scene and there's many competing agendas, and there's lots of different motivations and moments and I think the way Bob shot this is wonderful. I like the pace of this scene. I had to fight to preserve the pace of this scene, 'cause it's- it verges on the slow. And there are those who thought it was like watching paint dry, but I really like the slower scenes. I like this because it's really about character. This is really a scene about character and motivation, and love, and philosophy, and I think it's just a beautifully written piece of film, but I think it's really one of the better scenes in the show.
Line 363: Line 363:
This was a very difficult little section in the editorial. We didn't quite have the pieces. This is one of those things that writers put in scripts very- in a very blasé way that- you describe this setup and then it isn't communicated correctly or you don't prep it correctly, and essentially, you don't have the pieces on the day to really make this sequence work. You're- this isn't- this whole thing of the bomb working off. You wish you had more sections here to play with. There's- we're missing cutbacks to people. Timing is off a little bit. You're not really- you can't cut to the door as many times as you want to. You blow through it and you cheat as much as you can.
This was a very difficult little section in the editorial. We didn't quite have the pieces. This is one of those things that writers put in scripts very- in a very blasé way that- you describe this setup and then it isn't communicated correctly or you don't prep it correctly, and essentially, you don't have the pieces on the day to really make this sequence work. You're- this isn't- this whole thing of the bomb working off. You wish you had more sections here to play with. There's- we're missing cutbacks to people. Timing is off a little bit. You're not really- you can't cut to the door as many times as you want to. You blow through it and you cheat as much as you can.
<!-- 34:17 -->
<!-- 34:17 -->
== Act 4 ==
== Act 4 ==
<!-- 34:18 -->
<!-- 34:18 -->

To edit this page, please enter the words that appear below in the box (more info):

Refresh
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

  [] · [[]] · [[|]] · {{}} · · “” ‘’ «» ‹› „“ ‚‘ · ~ | ° &nbsp; · ± × ÷ ² ³ ½ · §
     [[Category:]] · [[:File:]] · [[Special:MyLanguage/]] · <code></code> · <nowiki></nowiki> <code><nowiki></nowiki></code> · <syntaxhighlight></syntaxhighlight> · <includeonly></includeonly> · <noinclude></noinclude> · #REDIRECT[[]] · <translate></translate> · <languages/> · {{#translation:}} · <tvar|></> · {{DEFAULTSORT:}} · <categorytree></categorytree> · <div style="clear:both;"></div> <s></s>


Your changes will be visible immediately.
  • For testing, please use the sandbox instead.
  • On talk pages, please sign your comment by typing four tildes (~~~~).