Editing Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/RC Patrol
Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank/RC Patrol
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Sounds like a plan. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 06:30, 11 October 2006 (CDT) | Sounds like a plan. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 06:30, 11 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
As always, I don't like measuring "useful" edits vs. non-useful ones. We should have a single standard for page moves, article patroling, etc. --[[User: | As always, I don't like measuring "useful" edits vs. non-useful ones. We should have a single standard for page moves, article patroling, etc. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 11:11, 11 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
:Yeah. On the whole "edits" thing is abirtraity. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 11:15, 11 October 2006 (CDT) | :Yeah. On the whole "edits" thing is abirtraity. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 11:15, 11 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
# [[User:Day|Day]] - | # [[User:Day|Day]] - | ||
# [[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] - {{oppose}} i dont really feel a need for this. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 09:04, 15 October 2006 (CDT) | # [[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] - {{oppose}} i dont really feel a need for this. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 09:04, 15 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
# [[User: | # [[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] - | ||
# [[User:Shane|Shane]] - {{Support}} --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 18:14, 14 October 2006 (CDT) | # [[User:Shane|Shane]] - {{Support}} --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 18:14, 14 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
# [[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] - {{oppose}}. Sounds like we're making sub-admins. That's what a contributor is. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 09:29, 15 October 2006 (CDT) | # [[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] - {{oppose}}. Sounds like we're making sub-admins. That's what a contributor is. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 09:29, 15 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
== Really like another look @ this == | == Really like another look @ this == | ||
With Season 4 coming up, we could have another flux of | With Season 4 coming up, we could have another flux of offsite vistors, and using the "Patrolled" check, would really help use not have to dobule up on work. Granted, most sysops have this ability already, but a core group of regular non-sysops should have access to this as well. Any more thoughts? [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 23:43, 1 November 2007 (CDT) | ||