CoreyDanian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
April Arcus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:::Do you have a source on that? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:43, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | :::Do you have a source on that? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:43, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::Nop. Just intuition.--[[User:CoreyDanian|CoreyDanian]] | ::::Nop. Just intuition.--[[User:CoreyDanian|CoreyDanian]] | ||
:::::Unfortunately, intuition isn't enough for us here. You might want to give [[BW:CITE]] a read. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:21, 3 October 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 06:21, 3 October 2006
Shouldn't we call the Space Park something more Galactica like. This ship could be the Rising Star even with Libran registry. it could've been in orbit around Picon during the attacks?
- If the "Rising Star" resembles the TOS version, it would look nothing like the Space Park. In any case, we've had no indication that they are the same ship - remember, it's a big fleet. --Peter Farago 19:37, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- You never know, Peter. But I believe that that is the Rising Star.--CoreyDanian 3 October 2006
- Do you have a source on that? --Peter Farago 22:43, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Nop. Just intuition.--CoreyDanian
- Unfortunately, intuition isn't enough for us here. You might want to give BW:CITE a read. --Peter Farago 01:21, 3 October 2006 (CDT)
- Nop. Just intuition.--CoreyDanian
- Do you have a source on that? --Peter Farago 22:43, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- You never know, Peter. But I believe that that is the Rising Star.--CoreyDanian 3 October 2006