Talk:Resurrection tub/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Resurrection tub/Archive 1
(comment.) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hey, I was checking the BSG glossary at the official site [http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/storysofar/glossary/page3.html], and I noticed that this is called a "Resurrection Chamber". Should we change the name? --[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 19:35, 13 September 2006 (CDT) | Hey, I was checking the BSG glossary at the official site [http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/storysofar/glossary/page3.html], and I noticed that this is called a "Resurrection Chamber". Should we change the name? --[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 19:35, 13 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
:I've gone ahead and proposed the move with the move tag. [[User:Matthew|Matthew]] 13:24, 13 July 2007 (CDT) | :I've gone ahead and proposed the move with the move tag. [[User:Matthew|Matthew]] 13:24, 13 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
:To me, "chamber" refers to the room, while "tank" is the tub. That it's defined as "liquid-filled chamber" there sounds a bit weird. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 13:27, 13 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 18:27, 13 July 2007
Change Name[edit]
Hey, I was checking the BSG glossary at the official site [1], and I noticed that this is called a "Resurrection Chamber". Should we change the name? --Sauron18 19:35, 13 September 2006 (CDT)
- I've gone ahead and proposed the move with the move tag. Matthew 13:24, 13 July 2007 (CDT)
- To me, "chamber" refers to the room, while "tank" is the tub. That it's defined as "liquid-filled chamber" there sounds a bit weird. --Serenity 13:27, 13 July 2007 (CDT)