Talk:Resurrection Hub/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Why can't they just build a new one? It doesn't make sense that with their (necessarily presumed) massive industrial and technological base on their homeworld (what they used to build the first fleet) they can't just build a second hub. Nothing is irreplaceable. [[User:GodHead|GodHead]] 01:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | Why can't they just build a new one? It doesn't make sense that with their (necessarily presumed) massive industrial and technological base on their homeworld (what they used to build the first fleet) they can't just build a second hub. Nothing is irreplaceable. [[User:GodHead|GodHead]] 01:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Most likely for dramatic purposes. Lots of room for speculation.-- [[User:Fredmdbud|Fredmdbud]] 03:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:03, 10 September 2008
Picture
There should be a good picture of the hub from this last episode. Shane (talk) 15:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Earlier appearances of the Hub?
The set design of the Hub looked like the Resurrection Room seen in "Downloaded" (visible at the bottom of this page) which doesn't fit in with any other Cylon architecture we've seen. Also, it seems quite likely that the giant room the Threes were boxed in at the end of "Rapture" was on the Hub. It's unlikely to ever be confirmed, but that might've been the intent of making the interior of the Hub look the way it did. -- David cgc 16:05, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Why can't they just build a new one? It doesn't make sense that with their (necessarily presumed) massive industrial and technological base on their homeworld (what they used to build the first fleet) they can't just build a second hub. Nothing is irreplaceable. GodHead 01:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Most likely for dramatic purposes. Lots of room for speculation.-- Fredmdbud 03:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)