(→Wikifying writers: redux) |
April Arcus (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Wikifying writers == | == Wikifying writers == | ||
Should all writers and directors (or for that matter, all crew) have their own pages, or just the ones with relevant backstories? If the latter, how do we measure their relevance? Should crew members who are deemed insufficiently relevant be wikified and left pageless until someone comes up with something to say? -- [[User:Mayosolo|Mayosolo]] 03:55, 20 January 2006 (EST) | Should all writers and directors (or for that matter, all crew) have their own pages, or just the ones with relevant backstories? If the latter, how do we measure their relevance? Should crew members who are deemed insufficiently relevant be wikified and left pageless until someone comes up with something to say? -- [[User:Mayosolo|Mayosolo]] 03:55, 20 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:Alternate suggestion - for those deemed irrelevant (that's so harsh!), should we link to their IMDb pages? -- [[User:Mayosolo|Mayosolo]] 04:13, 20 January 2006 (EST) | |||
::That's the current practice. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:35, 20 January 2006 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 15:35, 20 January 2006
Wikifying writers
Should all writers and directors (or for that matter, all crew) have their own pages, or just the ones with relevant backstories? If the latter, how do we measure their relevance? Should crew members who are deemed insufficiently relevant be wikified and left pageless until someone comes up with something to say? -- Mayosolo 03:55, 20 January 2006 (EST)
- Alternate suggestion - for those deemed irrelevant (that's so harsh!), should we link to their IMDb pages? -- Mayosolo 04:13, 20 January 2006 (EST)
- That's the current practice. --Peter Farago 10:35, 20 January 2006 (EST)