Battlestar Wiki talk:Spoiler Policy

Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Spoiler Policy
Revision as of 07:04, 20 April 2006 by April Arcus (talk | contribs) (→‎Koenigrules / Hollywood North Report: Moving this to the citation Jihad, with apologies. Spoiler policy should discuss the policy as a whole, not individual sources)

Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.

Previous discussions:

Complaints and Concerns, Spoiler Warning, What is a spoiler?, Vote, When does this vote close?

Compromise #1, Discussion


External Links

Links to Wikipedia using the Wikipedia: interwiki namespace still show up inside spoiltext. Example

Spoiler follows, highlight to read.
Battlestar Galactica


Fix: add this to the CSS:

td.spoiltext_box a.extiw {color: #000;}

--Peter Farago 18:29, 23 September 2005 (EDT)

"Spoiler Boxes"

moved from Nelana Cain

The spoiler boxes have a serious flaw--you can't see the "this is a spoiler" line at the top when you're using the Monobook skin. It's too dark to read. I highlighted and ended up seeing the spoiler, and I didn't want to. Of course now I know what the box is and I won't highlight it anymore, but I would appreciate it if the box could be edited to be compatible with all the skins. Thanks. --Fang Aili 00:16, 24 September 2005 (EDT)

I think oncer the "new" design is active, the CSS will be updated for a single skin and then that skin will be changed so CSS would be the primary way to color tables, instead of hardcoding values. The other skins joe should have deleted (as he did before the 1.6.x upgrade) to make sure we all worked from one skin when working on the site. So that's with the problem with the monoskin right now. --Shane (T - C - E) 01:15, 20 April 2006 (CDT)