This looks good. We might want to change some field names to more obvious values - maybe "start" and "end" rather than "date1" and "date2", and make it clearer that "lnumber" and "number" refer to the next available non-full archive. --Peter Farago 20:14, 15 May 2006 (CDT)
- Excellent. Let's leave this open to comments for a day or two before implementing on a wide scale. --Peter Farago 21:16, 15 May 2006 (CDT)
We need a way to signal that an archive is still open. --Peter Farago 04:05, 26 December 2006 (CST)