More actions
Why are we using small site icons on top of our own for external links? That seems to imply that those sites are subordinate to us, in some way. We should just use their regular logos. --Peter Farago 16:42, 29 April 2006 (CDT)
- It doesn't suggset they are subordinate. The icons together means "partnership". If we where on top, it would say "Battlestar Wiki 'Sister Projects'" --Shane (T - C - E) 17:16, 29 April 2006 (CDT)
- But we're not in "partnership" with them. We just admire the other sites and are offering links. --Peter Farago 17:17, 29 April 2006 (CDT)
- then Special friends. Gateworld, as Joe pointed out, gives us permission to use images from thier site and we use alot of Wikipedia's stuff. We should even get a Memory Alpha Icon because they provided images also. I just don't think up these things, they are in most of the "Policy" pages that are in the Category:Wikipedia --Shane (T - C - E) 17:50, 29 April 2006 (CDT)
- I completely disagree. Superimposing their logo on ours implies a relationship that does not exist. Mercifull, I understand that this is your department - it would be cool if you could upload stand-alone versions of these icons. If not, I'll do it later this week. --Peter Farago 04:25, 30 April 2006 (CDT)
- then Special friends. Gateworld, as Joe pointed out, gives us permission to use images from thier site and we use alot of Wikipedia's stuff. We should even get a Memory Alpha Icon because they provided images also. I just don't think up these things, they are in most of the "Policy" pages that are in the Category:Wikipedia --Shane (T - C - E) 17:50, 29 April 2006 (CDT)
- But we're not in "partnership" with them. We just admire the other sites and are offering links. --Peter Farago 17:17, 29 April 2006 (CDT)