m damn. typo |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Btw, as for your problem with the pictures. There is something wrong with Mediawiki and it won't work. You should comment out the pictures for now --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 10:18, 30 December 2006 (CST) | :Btw, as for your problem with the pictures. There is something wrong with Mediawiki and it won't work. You should comment out the pictures for now --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 10:18, 30 December 2006 (CST) | ||
::There we go. Thanks to Merciful for the image comment-outs. Made a quick edit regarding the ship-to-ship/bombardment difference. -[[User:Madbrood|Madbrood]] 10:29, 30 December 2006 (CST) |
Revision as of 16:29, 30 December 2006
Valkyrie
Good shout with the Valkyrie reference, Serenity. Totally forgot about that! -Madbrood 10:09, 30 December 2006 (CST)
- No problem. It's not really the same as that was more of an "air-to-air" missile than an "ICBM" (to use analogies), but I don't see why they couldn't use them or similar missiles for orbital bombardments. Maybe some further rewording is in order, to point out that difference.
- Btw, as for your problem with the pictures. There is something wrong with Mediawiki and it won't work. You should comment out the pictures for now --Serenity 10:18, 30 December 2006 (CST)
- There we go. Thanks to Merciful for the image comment-outs. Made a quick edit regarding the ship-to-ship/bombardment difference. -Madbrood 10:29, 30 December 2006 (CST)