Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Missile tubes/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Missile tubes/Archive 1
Serenity (talk | contribs)
m damn. typo
Madbrood (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


:Btw, as for your problem with the pictures. There is something wrong with Mediawiki and it won't work. You should comment out the pictures for now --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 10:18, 30 December 2006 (CST)
:Btw, as for your problem with the pictures. There is something wrong with Mediawiki and it won't work. You should comment out the pictures for now --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 10:18, 30 December 2006 (CST)
::There we go. Thanks to Merciful for the image comment-outs. Made a quick edit regarding the ship-to-ship/bombardment difference. -[[User:Madbrood|Madbrood]] 10:29, 30 December 2006 (CST)

Revision as of 16:29, 30 December 2006

Valkyrie

Good shout with the Valkyrie reference, Serenity. Totally forgot about that! -Madbrood 10:09, 30 December 2006 (CST)

No problem. It's not really the same as that was more of an "air-to-air" missile than an "ICBM" (to use analogies), but I don't see why they couldn't use them or similar missiles for orbital bombardments. Maybe some further rewording is in order, to point out that difference.
Btw, as for your problem with the pictures. There is something wrong with Mediawiki and it won't work. You should comment out the pictures for now --Serenity 10:18, 30 December 2006 (CST)
There we go. Thanks to Merciful for the image comment-outs. Made a quick edit regarding the ship-to-ship/bombardment difference. -Madbrood 10:29, 30 December 2006 (CST)
Contents