Talk:Missile tubes/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:20, 30 December 2006

Valkyrie

Good shout with the Valkyrie reference, Serenity. Totally forgot about that! -Madbrood 10:09, 30 December 2006 (CST)

No problem. It's not really the same as that was more of an "air-to-air" missile than an "ICBM" (to use analogies), but I don't see why they couldn't use them or similar missiles for orbital bombardments. Maybe some further rewording is in order, to point out that difference.

Btw, as for your problem with the pictures. There is something wrong with Mediawiki and it won't work. You should comment out the pictures for now --Serenity 10:18, 30 December 2006 (CST)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Good shout with the Valkyrie reference, Serenity. Totally forgot about that! -[[User:Madbrood|Madbrood]] 10:09, 30 December 2006 (CST)
-:No problem. It's not really the same as that was more of an "air-to-air" missile than an "ICBM" (to use analogies), but I don't see why they couldn't use them or similar missules for orbital bombardments. Maybe some further rewording is in order, to point out that difference.
+:No problem. It's not really the same as that was more of an "air-to-air" missile than an "ICBM" (to use analogies), but I don't see why they couldn't use them or similar missiles for orbital bombardments. Maybe some further rewording is in order, to point out that difference.
 :Btw, as for your problem with the pictures. There is something wrong with Mediawiki and it won't work. You should comment out the pictures for now --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 10:18, 30 December 2006 (CST)