No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Good shout with the Valkyrie reference, Serenity. Totally forgot about that! -[[User:Madbrood|Madbrood]] 10:09, 30 December 2006 (CST) | Good shout with the Valkyrie reference, Serenity. Totally forgot about that! -[[User:Madbrood|Madbrood]] 10:09, 30 December 2006 (CST) | ||
:No problem. It's not really the same as that was more of an "air-to-air" missile than an "ICBM" (to use analogies), but I don't see why they | :No problem. It's not really the same as that was more of an "air-to-air" missile than an "ICBM" (to use analogies), but I don't see why they couldn't use them or similar missules for orbital bombardments. Maybe some further rewording is in order, to point out that difference. | ||
:Btw, as for your problem with the pictures. There is something wrong with Mediawiki and it won't work. You should comment out the pictures for now --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 10:18, 30 December 2006 (CST) | :Btw, as for your problem with the pictures. There is something wrong with Mediawiki and it won't work. You should comment out the pictures for now --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 10:18, 30 December 2006 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 16:20, 30 December 2006
Valkyrie
Good shout with the Valkyrie reference, Serenity. Totally forgot about that! -Madbrood 10:09, 30 December 2006 (CST)
- No problem. It's not really the same as that was more of an "air-to-air" missile than an "ICBM" (to use analogies), but I don't see why they couldn't use them or similar missules for orbital bombardments. Maybe some further rewording is in order, to point out that difference.
- Btw, as for your problem with the pictures. There is something wrong with Mediawiki and it won't work. You should comment out the pictures for now --Serenity 10:18, 30 December 2006 (CST)