BklynBruzer (talk | contribs) m Forgot to sign it before. |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
--[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 07:57, 12 September 2006 (CDT) | --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 07:57, 12 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
:I'm pretty sure it is, and I was gonna bring that up myself, wondering how that ship could be with the fleet but not have FTL capability --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 08:02, 12 September 2006 (CDT) | :I'm pretty sure it is, and I was gonna bring that up myself, wondering how that ship could be with the fleet but not have FTL capability --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 08:02, 12 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
::Clearly the colonials didn't manufacture just one botanical cruiser; and at least one other botanical cruiser was refitted with FTL drive. I wonder, however, if the plants all died due to radiation exposure ([[The Passage]])[[User:TaKometer|TaKometer]] 21:56, 9 December 2006 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:56, 10 December 2006
About the botanical cruiser in the series. I noticed that ship too, but are we sure it's the same type? I think the domes are smaller and obviously it's FTL capable. And it appears in so many different shots - also ones that have new activity, like Boomer's return to the fleet when she finds Kobol - that it can't be just stockfootage from the mini-series. Maybe someone can find some comparative screencaps and if they are different, it should should be made clear that they aren't the same --Serenity 07:57, 12 September 2006 (CDT)
- I'm pretty sure it is, and I was gonna bring that up myself, wondering how that ship could be with the fleet but not have FTL capability --BklynBruzer 08:02, 12 September 2006 (CDT)
- Clearly the colonials didn't manufacture just one botanical cruiser; and at least one other botanical cruiser was refitted with FTL drive. I wonder, however, if the plants all died due to radiation exposure (The Passage)TaKometer 21:56, 9 December 2006 (CST)