More actions
April Arcus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
CoreyDanian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::You never know, Peter. But I believe that that is the ''Rising Star''.--[[User:CoreyDanian|CoreyDanian]] 3 October 2006 | ::You never know, Peter. But I believe that that is the ''Rising Star''.--[[User:CoreyDanian|CoreyDanian]] 3 October 2006 | ||
:::Do you have a source on that? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:43, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | :::Do you have a source on that? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:43, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::Nop. Just intuition.--[[User:CoreyDanian|CoreyDanian]] | |||
Revision as of 05:02, 3 October 2006
Shouldn't we call the Space Park something more Galactica like. This ship could be the Rising Star even with Libran registry. it could've been in orbit around Picon during the attacks?
- If the "Rising Star" resembles the TOS version, it would look nothing like the Space Park. In any case, we've had no indication that they are the same ship - remember, it's a big fleet. --Peter Farago 19:37, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- You never know, Peter. But I believe that that is the Rising Star.--CoreyDanian 3 October 2006
- Do you have a source on that? --Peter Farago 22:43, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Nop. Just intuition.--CoreyDanian
- Do you have a source on that? --Peter Farago 22:43, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- You never know, Peter. But I believe that that is the Rising Star.--CoreyDanian 3 October 2006