Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Zephyr/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Zephyr/Archive 1
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
:If the "Rising Star" resembles the TOS version, it would look nothing like the Space Park. In any case, we've had no indication that they are the same ship - remember, it's a big fleet. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:37, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
:If the "Rising Star" resembles the TOS version, it would look nothing like the Space Park. In any case, we've had no indication that they are the same ship - remember, it's a big fleet. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:37, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
::You never know, Peter. But I believe that that is the ''Rising Star''.--[[User:CoreyDanian|CoreyDanian]] 3 October 2006
::You never know, Peter. But I believe that that is the ''Rising Star''.--[[User:CoreyDanian|CoreyDanian]] 3 October 2006
:::Do you have a source on that? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:43, 2 October 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 03:43, 3 October 2006

Shouldn't we call the Space Park something more Galactica like. This ship could be the Rising Star even with Libran registry. it could've been in orbit around Picon during the attacks?

If the "Rising Star" resembles the TOS version, it would look nothing like the Space Park. In any case, we've had no indication that they are the same ship - remember, it's a big fleet. --Peter Farago 19:37, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
You never know, Peter. But I believe that that is the Rising Star.--CoreyDanian 3 October 2006
Do you have a source on that? --Peter Farago 22:43, 2 October 2006 (CDT)