Battlestar Wiki talk:Assume good faith: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Assume good faith
More actions
m →Delete?: I wish to remain anonymous :) |
Steelviper (talk | contribs) →Delete?: Me? Sarcastic? Never... |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This blatant personal attack against me should be deleted immediately... (It's a shame that there aren't [smartass] or [sarcasm] HTML or XHTML tags. It might save some confusion.) --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:11, 27 September 2006 (CDT) | This blatant personal attack against me should be deleted immediately... (It's a shame that there aren't [smartass] or [sarcasm] HTML or XHTML tags. It might save some confusion.) --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:11, 27 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
:Shane, how about a sarcasm templete :) --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 10:13, 27 September 2006 (CDT) | :Shane, how about a sarcasm templete :) --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 10:13, 27 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
::''The preceding text was sarcastic. In the event that it was meant to be taken seriously, it probably wouldn't have had a '''SARCASM TAG''' immediately following it.'' Hmm... Maybe not.--[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:42, 27 September 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:42, 27 September 2006
Delete?
This blatant personal attack against me should be deleted immediately... (It's a shame that there aren't [smartass] or [sarcasm] HTML or XHTML tags. It might save some confusion.) --Steelviper 10:11, 27 September 2006 (CDT)
- Shane, how about a sarcasm templete :) --FrankieG 10:13, 27 September 2006 (CDT)
- The preceding text was sarcastic. In the event that it was meant to be taken seriously, it probably wouldn't have had a SARCASM TAG immediately following it. Hmm... Maybe not.--Steelviper 10:42, 27 September 2006 (CDT)