Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Bastille Day/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Bastille Day/Archive 1
Steelviper (talk | contribs)
Gougef (talk | contribs)
→‎Analysis: cleanup
Line 4: Line 4:
::Duh! on me. thanks. --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
::Duh! on me. thanks. --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
:::Well we certainly don't utilize those as much around here as, say, Wikipedia. Actually over at "Big W" I think they even have "section level" templates ("This section has been marked for cleanup") though I think that may be overkill, especially with the explanation (provided above). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 13:07, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
:::Well we certainly don't utilize those as much around here as, say, Wikipedia. Actually over at "Big W" I think they even have "section level" templates ("This section has been marked for cleanup") though I think that may be overkill, especially with the explanation (provided above). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 13:07, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
::::I cleaned up the "format" of the Analysis section, but think that it could use a rewrite also. --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 14:45, 23 September 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 19:45, 23 September 2006

Analysis

Analysis Section in this episode has been done differently. Just wanted to make a note about it so it can be fixed later. Also, the analysis needs a rewrite. --FrankieG 11:36, 18 September 2006 (CDT)

Maybe slap a {{Cleanup}} at the top? --Steelviper 11:43, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
Duh! on me. thanks. --FrankieG 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
Well we certainly don't utilize those as much around here as, say, Wikipedia. Actually over at "Big W" I think they even have "section level" templates ("This section has been marked for cleanup") though I think that may be overkill, especially with the explanation (provided above). --Steelviper 13:07, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
I cleaned up the "format" of the Analysis section, but think that it could use a rewrite also. --FrankieG 14:45, 23 September 2006 (CDT)
Contents