More actions
→Analysis: Duh! ;) |
Steelviper (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Maybe slap a <nowiki>{{Cleanup}}</nowiki> at the top? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:43, 18 September 2006 (CDT) | :Maybe slap a <nowiki>{{Cleanup}}</nowiki> at the top? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:43, 18 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
::Duh! on me. thanks. --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT) | ::Duh! on me. thanks. --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::Well we certainly don't utilize those as much around here as, say, Wikipedia. Actually over at "Big W" I think they even have "section level" templates ("This section has been marked for cleanup") though I think that may be overkill, especially with the explanation (provided above). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 13:07, 18 September 2006 (CDT) |
Revision as of 18:07, 18 September 2006
Analysis
Analysis Section in this episode has been done differently. Just wanted to make a note about it so it can be fixed later. Also, the analysis needs a rewrite. --FrankieG 11:36, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
- Maybe slap a {{Cleanup}} at the top? --Steelviper 11:43, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
- Duh! on me. thanks. --FrankieG 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
- Well we certainly don't utilize those as much around here as, say, Wikipedia. Actually over at "Big W" I think they even have "section level" templates ("This section has been marked for cleanup") though I think that may be overkill, especially with the explanation (provided above). --Steelviper 13:07, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
- Duh! on me. thanks. --FrankieG 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT)