Steelviper (talk | contribs) + stats |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*Lowest number of supports for successful nom: 2 (Steelviper, that bastard) | *Lowest number of supports for successful nom: 2 (Steelviper, that bastard) | ||
I suspect that my "record" is likely to stand indefinitely, as the chances of somebody successfully gaining adminship with only one support are poor. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:11, 30 June 2006 (CDT) | I suspect that my "record" is likely to stand indefinitely, as the chances of somebody successfully gaining adminship with only one support are poor. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:11, 30 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
:Interesting. To be fair to you tho Steelviper, you were voted in as administrator at a time when the wiki was fairly new and not as active as it is now. Cool to see that all successfull nom's didnt have a single oppose.--[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 10:13, 30 June 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:13, 30 June 2006
Stats
Just thought I'd note some stats regarding successful admin nominations:
- Mean number of supports per successful nom: 5.5
- Number of opposes per successful num (mean, median... everything): 0
- Highest number of supports for successful nom: 7 (Mercifull)
- Lowest number of supports for successful nom: 2 (Steelviper, that bastard)
I suspect that my "record" is likely to stand indefinitely, as the chances of somebody successfully gaining adminship with only one support are poor. --Steelviper 10:11, 30 June 2006 (CDT)