Battlestar Wiki talk:Requests for comment/April Arcus: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:47, 8 June 2006

RFC thoughts

I'm not a huge fan of this process. I know it has precedent over at Wikipedia, but I'm not even certain of it being effective there. There hasn't been an RFC here that has been "carried" (received even the minimum number of endorsements). It seems like our time/resources would be better spent if the parties in dispute just quickly hashed out whatever problems they had rather than dragging the issue into "court".

I appreciate that Peter took the time to respond to this, but I expect that it'll go the way of Shane's RFC (the only other RFC I can recall since I've been here), and be deleted this weekend. --Steelviper 08:32, 8 June 2006 (CDT)

I did make an honest attempt to resolve our differences privately, and I would be happy to share the log of that conversation with you. --Peter Farago 10:47, 8 June 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 13:32, 8 June 2006 view source Steelviper (talk \| contribs) Sponsors, Chiefs 9,246 edits + can't we all just get along?		Revision as of 15:47, 8 June 2006 view source April Arcus (talk \| contribs) Chiefs 8,475 edits →‎RFC thoughts Newer edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:

	I appreciate that Peter took the time to respond to this, but I expect that it'll go the way of Shane's RFC (the only other RFC I can recall since I've been here), and be deleted this weekend. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 08:32, 8 June 2006 (CDT)		I appreciate that Peter took the time to respond to this, but I expect that it'll go the way of Shane's RFC (the only other RFC I can recall since I've been here), and be deleted this weekend. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 08:32, 8 June 2006 (CDT)

			:I did make an honest attempt to resolve our differences privately, and I would be happy to share the log of that conversation with you. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 10:47, 8 June 2006 (CDT)