Talk:Glen A. Larson/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:27, 27 May 2006

For reasons discussed on Talk:Basestar (TOS), we cannot use GFDL content here. I am reverting the article. --Peter Farago 18:33, 9 January 2006 (EST)

My bad. I was apparently following bad precedent. Does that mean we should blank the Lorne Green article as well? I was sad at how small the Glen Larson article was, and was hoping for a quick fix. Edited to add this link to everything that uses that template (in case we need to erase those as well).--Steelviper 22:05, 9 January 2006 (EST)

Yes, we should. I'm sorry I missed that. Let's continue this discussion on Battlestar Wiki talk:Derivative Works--Peter Farago 23:01, 9 January 2006 (EST)

Cite

I didn't know that. That's why it should cited. Not all of have the book. The location should be put there if it's a direct source. --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 23:27, 26 May 2006 (CDT)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ::Yes, we should. I'm sorry I missed that. Let's continue this discussion on [[Battlestar Wiki talk:Derivative Works]]--[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 23:01, 9 January 2006 (EST)
+== Cite ==
+I didn't know that. That's why it should cited. Not all of have the book. The location should be put there if it's a direct source. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 23:27, 26 May 2006 (CDT)