Talk:Eversun/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Eversun/Archive 1
(Citations needed)
 
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
*How was the Olympic Carrier identified as an Intersun vessel?
*How was the Olympic Carrier identified as an Intersun vessel?
--[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:00, 22 May 2006 (CDT)
--[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:00, 22 May 2006 (CDT)
:It appears that "Intersun" is visible on the side of Colonial Heavy 798. This argues pretty strongly against Intersun being a manufacturer, IMO - Boeing doesn't put their name on the sides of their planes, after all. So the question is, why is the red luxury liner on SciFi labeled "Gemon Liners" on the model and "Intersun Passenger Cruiser" in the text? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:05, 22 May 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 06:05, 22 May 2006

Citations needed

As far as I know, the only semi-canonical reference the Intersun is a brief mention on http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/ships/ships/ . We need to know the following information:

  • Is Intersun a manufacturer, like Boeing, or an operator, like United Airlines?
  • How were the crew of Colonial Heavy 798 identified as Intersun employees?
  • How was the Olympic Carrier identified as an Intersun vessel?

--Peter Farago 01:00, 22 May 2006 (CDT)

It appears that "Intersun" is visible on the side of Colonial Heavy 798. This argues pretty strongly against Intersun being a manufacturer, IMO - Boeing doesn't put their name on the sides of their planes, after all. So the question is, why is the red luxury liner on SciFi labeled "Gemon Liners" on the model and "Intersun Passenger Cruiser" in the text? --Peter Farago 01:05, 22 May 2006 (CDT)