More actions
April Arcus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
April Arcus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT) | ::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::This looks almost perfect, except that having the ":" spacer wrapped inside the <nowiki><small></nowiki> tag, as we were doing before, improves the alignment dramatically. We may have to use some kind of start-section, end-section system, like we did on the succession templates, to get around this. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 00:51, 17 May 2006 (CDT) | ::This looks almost perfect, except that having the ":" spacer wrapped inside the <nowiki><small></nowiki> tag, as we were doing before, improves the alignment dramatically. We may have to use some kind of start-section, end-section system, like we did on the succession templates, to get around this. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 00:51, 17 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
Maybe instead of the qif that axes the closing comma, we could just comma-separate the entries by hand? The template system is workable, but it seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 12:13, 20 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:13, 20 May 2006
Is there any way to get a single ":" style indent at the beginning of these lists, to line up the header links with the bullet point above them? --Peter Farago 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
- Ehm, I guess it's easy enough to do by hand. Not everything has to be automatic. --Peter Farago 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
- The <noinclude> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --Peter Farago 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
- This looks almost perfect, except that having the ":" spacer wrapped inside the <small> tag, as we were doing before, improves the alignment dramatically. We may have to use some kind of start-section, end-section system, like we did on the succession templates, to get around this. --Peter Farago 00:51, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
Maybe instead of the qif that axes the closing comma, we could just comma-separate the entries by hand? The template system is workable, but it seems kind of like overkill. --Peter Farago 12:13, 20 May 2006 (CDT)