Template talk:Archive-message: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:16, 16 May 2006

This looks good. We might want to change some field names to more obvious values - maybe "start" and "end" rather than "date1" and "date2", and make it clearer that "lnumber" and "number" refer to the next available non-full archive. --Peter Farago 20:14, 15 May 2006 (CDT)

Excellent. Let's leave this open to comments for a day or two before implementing on a wide scale. --Peter Farago 21:16, 15 May 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 01:14, 16 May 2006 view source April Arcus (talk \| contribs) Chiefs 8,475 edits No edit summary		Revision as of 02:16, 16 May 2006 view source April Arcus (talk \| contribs) Chiefs 8,475 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This looks good. We might want to change some field names to more obvious values - maybe "start" and "end" rather than "date1" and "date2", and make it clearer that "lnumber" and "number" refer to the next available non-full archive. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:14, 15 May 2006 (CDT)		This looks good. We might want to change some field names to more obvious values - maybe "start" and "end" rather than "date1" and "date2", and make it clearer that "lnumber" and "number" refer to the next available non-full archive. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:14, 15 May 2006 (CDT)

			:Excellent. Let's leave this open to comments for a day or two before implementing on a wide scale. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:16, 15 May 2006 (CDT)