Template talk:Image delete: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:32, 24 April 2006

Why would one want to blank the history of an image? Being able to revert to earlier versions is often a valuable tool. --Peter Farago 11:59, 24 April 2006 (CDT)

For some cases, like the images me and Mercifull, once I submitted something and then he updated it, what is the point of having two of the same image. This would go for the DVD screencaptures also. --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 12:02, 24 April 2006 (CDT)

For example. There was originally one image for a translation project whereas now there are two. The old one was then put forward for deletion. --Mercifull 12:04, 24 April 2006 (CDT)

Total deletation, not just a reverion deletion, I beleive... --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 12:06, 24 April 2006 (CDT)

I've often found that new screencaptures are inferior to older versions. We shouldn't deprive ourselves of the ability to make that choice later on. --Peter Farago 12:32, 24 April 2006 (CDT)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ::For example. There was originally one image for a translation project whereas now there are two. The old one was then put forward for deletion. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 12:04, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
 :::Total deletation, not just a reverion deletion, I beleive... --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:06, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
+:I've often found that new screencaptures are inferior to older versions. We shouldn't deprive ourselves of the ability to make that choice later on. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 12:32, 24 April 2006 (CDT)