Template talk:Image delete: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:02, 24 April 2006

Why would one want to blank the history of an image? Being able to revert to earlier versions is often a valuable tool. --Peter Farago 11:59, 24 April 2006 (CDT)

For some cases, like the images me and Mercifull, once I submitted something and then he updated it, what is the point of having two of the same image. This would go for the DVD screencaptures also. --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 12:02, 24 April 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 16:59, 24 April 2006 view source April Arcus (talk \| contribs) Chiefs 8,475 edits No edit summary		Revision as of 17:02, 24 April 2006 view source Shane (talk \| contribs) Senior Chiefs, Marines, interwiki, Sponsors, CAP, Chiefs 17,616 edits reply to peter Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Why would one want to blank the history of an image? Being able to revert to earlier versions is often a valuable tool. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 11:59, 24 April 2006 (CDT)		Why would one want to blank the history of an image? Being able to revert to earlier versions is often a valuable tool. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 11:59, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
			:For some cases, like the images me and Mercifull, once I submitted something and then he updated it, what is the point of having two of the same image. This would go for the DVD screencaptures also. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 12:02, 24 April 2006 (CDT)