Template talk:Sourcebox: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Template:Sourcebox
More actions
Steelviper (talk | contribs) source ? |
Steelviper (talk | contribs) →Sources: clarification of authorship |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Sources == | == Sources == | ||
Are there existing sources already within the wiki that we should capture into the source namespace? I was wondering if Podcasts qualified, and we also have that essay on [[Naturalistic science fiction]] that Spence posted inline with the article that could get a source namespace and transcluded (instead of being in the article area). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 14:55, 12 April 2006 (CDT) | Are there existing sources already within the wiki that we should capture into the source namespace? I was wondering if Podcasts qualified, and we also have that essay written by RDM on [[Naturalistic science fiction]] that Spence posted inline with the article that could get a source namespace and transcluded (instead of being in the article area). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 14:55, 12 April 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:55, 12 April 2006
Sources
Are there existing sources already within the wiki that we should capture into the source namespace? I was wondering if Podcasts qualified, and we also have that essay written by RDM on Naturalistic science fiction that Spence posted inline with the article that could get a source namespace and transcluded (instead of being in the article area). --Steelviper 14:55, 12 April 2006 (CDT)