Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Template talk:Sourcebox: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Template:Sourcebox
Steelviper (talk | contribs)
source ?
 
Steelviper (talk | contribs)
→‎Sources: clarification of authorship
Line 1: Line 1:
== Sources ==
== Sources ==
Are there existing sources already within the wiki that we should capture into the source namespace? I was wondering if Podcasts qualified, and we also have that essay on [[Naturalistic science fiction]] that Spence posted inline with the article that could get a source namespace and transcluded (instead of being in the article area). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 14:55, 12 April 2006 (CDT)
Are there existing sources already within the wiki that we should capture into the source namespace? I was wondering if Podcasts qualified, and we also have that essay written by RDM on [[Naturalistic science fiction]] that Spence posted inline with the article that could get a source namespace and transcluded (instead of being in the article area). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 14:55, 12 April 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 19:55, 12 April 2006

Sources

Are there existing sources already within the wiki that we should capture into the source namespace? I was wondering if Podcasts qualified, and we also have that essay written by RDM on Naturalistic science fiction that Spence posted inline with the article that could get a source namespace and transcluded (instead of being in the article area). --Steelviper 14:55, 12 April 2006 (CDT)

Contents