April Arcus (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Steelviper (talk | contribs) Wow. TOS stuff actually can pay off. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Naming== | ==Naming== | ||
Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding [[Cylon transport|RDM craft]]. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST) | Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding [[Cylon transport|RDM craft]]. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST) | ||
:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 02:02, 15 February 2006
Naming
Based on the schematic image that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding RDM craft. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --Peter Farago 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)
- I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --Steelviper 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)