Talk:Military Hairstyle/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
More actions
April Arcus (talk | contribs) |
Steelviper (talk | contribs) Delete? |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Lax enforcement of the regulations at the current time? --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 21:15, 14 September 2005 (EDT) | :Lax enforcement of the regulations at the current time? --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 21:15, 14 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
::Yes, I imagine they all have bigger fish to fry. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:14, 14 September 2005 (EDT) | ::Yes, I imagine they all have bigger fish to fry. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:14, 14 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
== Delete == | |||
This feels like a "military hand salute" article. It all may be true, but it amounts to a "telephone" article. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:27, 24 January 2006 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 15:27, 24 January 2006
Source?
Where does this information come from? --Fang Aili 12:56, 13 September 2005 (EDT)
It looks like the US Military regulations. I had to follow these in ROTC and these look like them. --Talos 14:18, 13 September 2005 (EDT)
Why doesn't Kat have regulation hairstyle? If you look, even though she's joined the Fleet, when she's wearing a flightsuit (though her helmet is off) she's got this bulky two foot long ponytail, with scrunchies every 4 inches or so to keep it under control. I don't know how this fits inside her helmet (as pilots helmets link with their suit to keep an airtight seal), thought I have noticed when she wears her helmet that there's a lot of hair bunched around her face. I don't know how she gets away with this then. ---Ricimer, 14 Sept, 2005.
- Lax enforcement of the regulations at the current time? --Talos 21:15, 14 September 2005 (EDT)
- Yes, I imagine they all have bigger fish to fry. --Peter Farago 22:14, 14 September 2005 (EDT)
Delete
This feels like a "military hand salute" article. It all may be true, but it amounts to a "telephone" article. --Steelviper 10:27, 24 January 2006 (EST)