Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Resurrection Ship, Part II/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Resurrection Ship, Part II/Archive 1
Line 7: Line 7:
==Noteworthy Dialogue==
==Noteworthy Dialogue==


What's up with the long dialogue sections? It's supposed to be noteworthy dialogue, not an entire transcript of the episode. I think whoever posts those (And i'm starting to believe its one person doing it) needs to keep it to a minimum, at least keep it to the point where it isn't longer then the article for the episode itself.  -[[Bane Grievver]]
What's up with the long dialogue sections as of late? It's supposed to be noteworthy dialogue, not an entire transcript of the episode. I think whoever posts those (And i'm starting to believe its one person doing it) needs to keep it to a minimum, at least keep it to the point where it isn't longer then the article for the episode itself.  -[[Bane Grievver]]

Revision as of 02:22, 17 January 2006

Spoiler Pics

I have found a few spoiler pics for the upcomming episode. (You have been warned) Pic 1, Pic 2, Pic 3, Pic 4, Pic 5, Pic 6, Pic 7 --Blacklight

We've seen them, but thanks for the thought. --Peter Farago 03:40, 7 January 2006 (EST)


Noteworthy Dialogue

What's up with the long dialogue sections as of late? It's supposed to be noteworthy dialogue, not an entire transcript of the episode. I think whoever posts those (And i'm starting to believe its one person doing it) needs to keep it to a minimum, at least keep it to the point where it isn't longer then the article for the episode itself. -Bane Grievver